Gabbard releases Fauci files with new Covid origins details

By SUZANNE DOWNING

June 19, 2026 – On her final day as Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard released hundreds of pages of newly declassified documents alleging that Dr. Anthony Fauci played a central role in shaping intelligence assessments about the origins of Covid-19 and misled Congress about his involvement in discussions with US intelligence agencies.

The June 18 release from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is one of the most aggressive government statements to date supporting the theory that Covid-19 originated from a laboratory incident involving research conducted at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Gabbard accused Fauci of funding dangerous coronavirus research through grants that flowed from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to EcoHealth Alliance and ultimately to the Wuhan laboratory. The release further alleges that Fauci worked with sympathetic officials inside the intelligence community to steer assessments away from the lab-leak theory and toward a natural-origin explanation.

“The American people deserve transparency, truth, and accountability,” Gabbard said in the release, adding that years of “lies, censorship, and cover-ups” obscured the true origins of the pandemic.

The documents, according to ODNI, include emails, intelligence communications, whistleblower testimony, and internal assessments gathered during a yearlong declassification review ordered under President Trump’s transparency initiative.

Among the most significant allegations is that Fauci’s public statements and recommendations influenced intelligence community conclusions regarding Covid-19’s origins. The release says Fauci supplied “hand-picked” experts whose views were incorporated into official intelligence products, creating what ODNI described as a self-reinforcing cycle in which intelligence assessments and public scientific narratives supported one another.

ODNI also claims the newly released correspondence contradicts Fauci’s 2024 testimony before a House congressional panel. During that testimony, Fauci denied knowledge of discussions with intelligence agencies concerning viral research related to Covid-19. Gabbard’s office says the documents show otherwise.

The release further includes allegations from intelligence community whistleblowers who reported retaliation against analysts who favored the lab-leak hypothesis. According to ODNI, some analysts were marginalized, discouraged from pursuing certain lines of inquiry, or warned that dissenting views could affect their careers. Gabbard said those whistleblower accounts have been referred to the Intelligence Community Inspector General.

The documents arrive amid growing support for the lab-leak theory among some federal agencies and congressional investigators. The FBI and Department of Energy have previously concluded that a laboratory incident is the most likely explanation for the pandemic’s origin, although both assessments were issued with varying levels of confidence. Other intelligence agencies have continued to favor a natural spillover event or remain undecided. No government agency has publicly produced definitive proof establishing either theory.

Likewise, the broader scientific debate remains unresolved. While evidence has emerged supporting the possibility of a laboratory accident, some scientists continue to argue that a natural origin remains plausible. No publicly available evidence has conclusively settled the question.

Fauci has long acknowledged that NIH-funded grants supported coronavirus research conducted through EcoHealth Alliance and involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology. However, he has consistently disputed claims that the work constituted gain-of-function research as defined by US policy at the time or that it directly caused the pandemic. Congressional hearings over the past several years have repeatedly centered on disagreements over those definitions, oversight procedures, and reporting requirements.

The timing of the release is notable. Gabbard stepped down from her position this week, citing family considerations, due to her husband’s health condition. The declassification package follows other transparency initiatives undertaken during her tenure, including the release of information related to US-funded biological laboratories overseas.

Latest Post

Comments

23 thoughts on “Gabbard releases Fauci files with new Covid origins details”
  1. Fauci built actual institutions and saved lives with data while Tulsi was out there platforming Assad and chasing conspiracy clout. One’s a career scientist who stared down a pandemic, the other’s a political tourist in a sari. Apparently we’ve reached the stage of American politics where the guy who spent decades fighting deadly diseases is the villain, while the people who spent COVID promoting horse dewormer, conspiracy theories, and Facebook memes are somehow the heroes. Bring on the midterms!

    1. I have seen that some believe Dr. Fauci’s approach to AIDS and HIV was fundamentally flawed. Maybe he isn’t the great scientist that many promote.

      1. JMARK – “I have seen that some believe…” Yes, 10% of the population thinks the Earth is flat but that doesn’t mean I take them seriously or put merit in their conclusions. Another bunch of knuckleheads deny the holocaust. Before vaccines, 1 in 5 babies didn’t survive to their first birthday. Watching a flu outbreak sweep through a major military training installation after Pete Hegseth pointlessly politicized the vaccine requirement is a reminder that viruses are unimpressed by amateur political theater.

    2. Oh of course it was clear cut beyond any reasonable doubt that it was Batman who brought us this wonderful gift that keeps on giving and giving exactly like it was engineered to do…..Would you like to buy a bridge??? It is on sale today only.

    3. Fauci is a prime example of the Peter Principle lived out in real life. He rapidly floated to the top of his group during the AIDS debacle and maintained himself in an upper management role for over 40 years. Having performed little to no scientific study over that period, he is far from qualified to pontificate on this topic or any other.

      1. Dr. Anthony Fauci’s h-index (a metric measuring both the productivity and citation impact of his publications) is approximately 242 on Google Scholar, with nearly 300,000 career citations. Damien, what are you talking about when you write “having performed little to no scientific study over that period”? Look up the h-index of the quacks you get your “research” from and get back to us.

    4. Sorry, you are clueless. Proven by your ‘horse dewormer’ statement. If by horse dewormer you mean ivermectin, – yes, ivermectin s used in dewormer. It is used in a number of anti viral and anti-parasitical formulas. It was highly effective with Covid and I took it for that, with success. I did not take any formulated ‘horse dewormer’ but actually had a prescription from a a medical doctor who treats humans not livestock. Dr. Fauci may be a brilliant man, who indeed did much during his career, but he became full of himself, his own god, and with no moral absolute his actions around Covid, as well as the related research he was involved in, adding in also the deception, really crumbles his trustworthiness.

      1. Ivermectin is a spectacular anti parasite medicine but does nothing for viral infections except dupe the gullible.

        1. Virology does nothing except dupe the gullible. And make companies like Pfizer billions of dollars.

  2. There are several facts that should be understood in evaluating the role of Dr. Fauci in the Covid era. First, and this was pointed out by Dr. Robert Redford, the head of the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control at the time, is that Dr. Fauci was not or is not a virologist. Rather he is an immunologist. (Redford is a virologist.). Second is that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases is primarily a research center – not a line agency with responsibilities regarding the public health. (I have actually toured a component of the NIH in Maryland). I researched NIAID’s contributions to the body of knowledge about Covid using Grok and, IMO, they were modest. We all know now that NIAID and USAID were funding gain-of-function research. I fail to understand how and why Dr. Fauci was able to put himself in the middle of the Covid response. Add to this, as reported by Director Gabbard’s report, that Dr. Fauci was meeting with the Intelligence (?!) community about Covid. Why was this taking place?

    Dr. Fauci has moved, spoken, reacted, obscured and postured as you would expect a BAD ACTOR to behave. And then there is the preemptive pardon signed by Joey’s autopen. Something is seriously wrong when it comes to Dr. Fauci. He needs to be held accountable.

    1. “ Dr. Fauci has moved, spoken, reacted, obscured and postured.” I don’t really know what you mean by that JMARK. What is the evidence to support your chief complaint?

  3. Just on face value anything coming from the Trump miasma and specifically spiral-eyed Tulsi Gabbard is suspect. “The American people deserve transparency, truth, and accountability,” Gabbard said in the release, adding that years of “lies, censorship, and cover-ups” . Transparency in the Trump administration? No. Truth? No fucking way. Accountability? Not close to funny. Lies – the foundation of the pussy-grabber’s raid on democracy. Censorship? How about the removal of slavery related interpretation from NPS sites? Cover-ups? The Holy Trinity of cover-ups is the Epstein files. For hell’s sake, this woman is hypocrisy personified.

    But, maybe her claims about Fauci are strong enough to warrant an investigation. But no one from the Trump swamp can conduct it. It has to be a neutral body if there is such a thing anymore.

  4. “The American people deserve transparency, truth, and accountability,”

    Yeah, that would be nice…

  5. Washington Post reports that Tulsi Gabbard’s decisions as the director of national intelligence was heavily influenced by her Hare Krishna cult leader Chris Butler.

    The report alleges that Butler provided detailed guidance on policy, media appearances, and messaging through intermediaries and encrypted memos. Butler is, among other things, deeply homophobic and anti-Islam. I wonder if her “guru” made her push the biolabs bullshit or did she do it just for the love of the game?

    Either way, thank God the Spirit of Aloha has finally left the building.

        1. Perhaps the People’s Temple would welcome you with a nice pitcher of Flavor-Aid,they were of similar political views to you

  6. None of us regret NOT taking it.
    Fauci is a hack, nothing he did during COVID saved a single life. From these posts it looks like all the ones who took the shot were the exact ones that were supposed to take it. Double mask everyone….double mask, hell try 3 masks….what could it hurt. Hahahaha
    Mazel.

    1. “None of us regret NOT taking It” you don’t know that. How many of those who died but did not accept the vaccine wish otherwise.
      .
      The vaccine saved millions of lives. Ivermectin saved millions of cows.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support
The Alaska Story

Your support allows us to stay independent and continue documenting stories that deserve to be seen and matter.

Keep The Alaska Story Alive