By SUZANNE DOWNING
Senate Democrat Scott Kawasaki of Fairbanks has introduced legislation that would drastically limit the ability of local governing bodies to restrict or remove controversial or profane books from public library children’s sections and school libraries.
Senate Bill 238 was read across the Senate floor on Feb. 9 and referred to the Senate Judiciary and Education committees.
The measure is presented as an “access to library material” bill. It reaches into Alaska’s criminal code by creating new special carve-out defenses for employees of schools, museums, and public libraries who are accused under certain offenses involving minors and indecent material.
Under the bill, a defendant would be completely protected in his or her actions if he or she was acting in the course of employment as a school, museum, or library employee or official.
The defenses would apply to statutes involving enticement of a minor, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and distribution of indecent material to minors.
Kawasaki believes he needs to protect librarians with a special carve-out that weakens accountability when explicit content is put in front of children.
The legislation would also require the commissioner of education to establish a statewide model policy governing how public libraries select, curate, and reconsider library materials, overriding local control of libraries. The bill describes public libraries as a “marketplace of ideas” and directs that policies must provide protection against attempts to censor materials.
Local governing bodies would be prohibited from removing library material based on disagreement with the ideas or concepts expressed in a work, including objections involving race, gender, sexuality, religion, or politics. The bill also bars governing bodies from restricting access, limiting searchability, or even requiring parental permission for minors to access library material.
SB 238 allows removal of material based on sexual content only under a legal test similar to obscenity standards, requiring findings that the work appeals to prurient interest under contemporary community standards, depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
The bill would prevent state or municipal authorities from reducing library funding because a library complies with these requirements, and it grants immunity from civil and criminal liability for library employees acting in good faith under the policy.
Perhaps most significantly, SB 238 allows librarians, students, parents, authors, booksellers, and publishers to sue government entities that censor or order censorship of library material. Damages would range from $451 to $1,451 per censored work, and prevailing plaintiffs would be entitled to attorney fees and costs. The measure specifies that library-allocated funds may not be used to pay those damages or legal expenses.



14 thoughts on “Kawasaki bill would shield librarians from prosecution if they have obscene books available for children”
Little Kawasaki, who does nothing in the Legislature, now has a new job defending wacko librarians. Librarians are all left-wing Marxist types, advancing DEI, woke, LGBTQ agendas. They love transgenders and all of the disgusting sexual advocacy that goes with it. Makes one wonder why Kawasaki is their new champion?
Maybe he has late fees on the LGBTQ books he checked out?
WilliamM. Sorry to hear about your loss of integrity but at least you still have cruelty.
Evenly Singed, always the dependable kneejerk supporter of everything radical leftist extremist.
.
Don’t you ever get tired of being wrong, and evil? And how does somebody so completely divorced from reality even manage to function within society? I would love to know.
He is a marxist. Lower then low and beneath contempt. Not worth any interaction unless it is to mock.
Cool thing about me is that I am seldom wrong, like almost never.
So Scott is writing a Law which makes Librarians above the Law?
I thought no one was above the Law?
And why is the Law needed if the Ak. Attorney General is too afraid to enforce the Law?
He’s working so hard to corrupt the kiddies. Stopping our employees from providing smut to kids,might keep them out of hisOr his friends’ grubby hands and he can’t have that
There is a fix for that. IF the state decides that it can tell everyone what material is acceptable and what is not in your local library, then let’s make them state institutions and let state pay for each and every one of them (including school libraries). I bet this would go away in a second. The total asinine rule here is the “can’t defund” clause and you can sue the city clause. What a farce!
There is nothing so lewd, so degenerate, so disgusting, so perverse, that Pee Wee Kawasaki won’t gladly have it rubbed in our children’s innocent faces.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xf4St0G1UyUIYuItyTQDLfzE9HTZwotB/view?fbclid=IwY2xjawPwvjRleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETE2NnBRbG5YUnNsTlNkSzFIc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHvjLaK57BcrG8Z7fycVcrIgnpzgWNu9LIGyZaPd9SnfYgM0uBlS2qmhbQGny_aem_URiuFWf_JYPAqBcmTle2Bw https://www.facebook.com/reel/1414446746889515 For a small example of what this man is wanting to continue to provide to YOUR children look at these two sites. The second one is currently in North Pole High. We, Moms for Liberty North Star Borough, have been doing this battle for a couple years. I have a lot of information on this issue and am happy to correspond or meet with any interested. momsforlibertynsb@gmail.com
Friends with Jharett Bryantt and Chris Constant?
Can someone please ask him why he wants kids to look at porn? I assume it is so his personal perversions can be more easily served. It is illegal under state law to provide porn to kids. Let’s bust a few librarians and see how long their “bold stand for freedom” lasts.
Thank you above commenters for exercising restraint in expressing your feelings toward little scotty, his promotion of kidporn, and his sexual assault on our children.