By THE ALASKA STORY
Aug. 16, 2026 – Mary Peltola’s campaign for the US Senate has undergone a sudden staff shakeup just days before Alaska voters head to the polls, with longtime political adviser Anton McParland no longer working for the campaign.
Kellen Browning, a national politics reporter for The New York Times, confirmed Sunday that McParland, Peltola’s campaign manager and former congressional chief of staff, “is no longer with the campaign.”
The campaign has not publicly disclosed or explained whether McParland resigned or was dismissed, nor has it announced who will take control of the operation as Peltola advances toward an expected general-election contest against Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan.
Social-media reports have claimed that other senior aides also departed or were let go. Those reports remain largely second-hand, however, and The Alaska Story has not independently confirmed the names or circumstances of the additional personnel changes.
Whatever caused the rupture, losing a campaign manager is rarely welcome news. Losing one who has been at the center of a candidate’s political organization for four years — just before the primary election — is an especially bad look.
McParland was vital to her political fortunes. He helped engineer Peltola’s breakthrough victory in the 2022 special election following the death of longtime Rep. Don Young and remained with her through the regular election campaign later that year.
After Peltola entered Congress, McParland became her deputy chief of staff and later chief of staff while continuing to play an important role in her political operation. A 2023 Alaska Public Media profile described him as one of Peltola’s closest advisers and quoted him calling her “one of my best friends in life.”
The same report said Peltola believed the two could practically read each other’s minds.
When Peltola lost her House seat to Republican Nick Begich in 2024, she and McParland moved together into the influence industry. Both joined the law and lobbying firm Holland & Hart in March 2025. Peltola became senior director of Alaska affairs, while McParland was named senior director of federal affairs, working between Anchorage and Washington. She reported earned over $400,000 a year.
McParland later returned to Peltola’s political operation for her 2026 challenge against Sullivan.
That long association makes his departure more significant than an ordinary midcampaign staffing change. McParland knew Peltola’s organization, donor network, political history and personal operating style better than nearly anyone in Democratic politics.
Peltola has built a national image around her broad smile and carefully cultivated “fish, family and freedom” persona. She cultivates a smile in public. Behind the scenes, however, former employees and others familiar with her congressional operation have described a much different management style, including allegations that she yelled at and berated staff members constantly. Those accounts have not been publicly documented in enough detail to determine whether they played any role in the current departures.
No evidence has emerged publicly connecting the shakeup to previous questions involving Peltola’s congressional or campaign operation.
McParland’s simultaneous employment by Peltola’s congressional office and campaign attracted scrutiny in 2023, although congressional ethics rules permit staff members to perform campaign work during their off-hours. Republican members of Congress also raised questions in 2025 about spending by Peltola’s former House office after she left office. Those matters are separate from the current campaign turmoil, and no public reporting has established a connection.
The immediate political problem for Peltola is one of timing and perception.
Alaska’s primary is Tuesday, Aug. 18. Peltola and Sullivan are both expected to advance under the state’s top-four system, but the primary results will provide the first statewide measure of their respective political strength heading into November.
Campaigns generally try to project stability and momentum during the final days before an election. Instead, Peltola’s operation is facing unanswered questions about why one of her closest and longest-serving advisers is suddenly gone — and whether McParland was the only senior figure to leave.
Until Peltola or her campaign provides an explanation, speculation will fill the vacuum. For a campaign seeking to unseat an incumbent senator in one of the most closely watched races in the country, an unexplained staff exodus on the eve of the primary is not the closing message it wanted.




19 thoughts on “Campaign in turmoil: Mary Peltola loses longtime manager days before Alaska primary”
Peltola will probably win. Only because sullivan is a faux conservative and many conservatives are disillusioned with him. Sad state of affairs.
Currently he’s the Republican. To not support him means you want a Democrat. The only reason why he isn’t as conservative as us Conservatives like him be is because how can he or any politician be while the people of Alaska are terribly government dependent. Fiscal conservatives aren’t the only residents who make up the population of Alaska nor do we have the majority. To move the state back on the centerline means the Right needs to move Alaska one inch at a time so dependent Alaskans don’t freak out.
Tim, I’m gonna give you a timeout!!! I think you must be blind and deaf to think that NoShow Peltola is such a good candidate. All of her ads on tv are nothing but BS lies. The one I really think that is insulting is the one that she claims to be for the military because she is the mother of veteran. GIVE ME A BREAK!!! LAME!!!
What rot. Pass along my regards to your buds in the Peltola campaign. Nice agitprop, though predictable. Cheers-
There is literally nothing to like or respect about peltola. A born loser. It is sad, sorry state of affairs that we are in having to chose between two imbeciles. The only thing that matters this fall is eliminating RCV. Yes on 2!
Conservatives had a miracle election in 2024 saved by the youth. The youth (29 and under) vote put Trump in the White House. Conservatives voted for no new wars, end the war in ukraine, more jobs, cheaper housing, epstein prosecutions, closing the border, deportations of illegas, MAHA, etc. We basically only closed the border. Well that isn’t going to cut it. Sullivan is a faux conservative. Why isn’t he demanding the passage of the Voter ID Act? Why isn’t he demanding more deportations? Why is it that he bows down to every demand of the criminal state of israel? Why is it the ONLY thing sullivan cares about is defense spending? That’s right sullivan loves defense spending and if it means American boys and girls have to die in their ridiculous instigated wars…. then that is what he will do. This conservative voter will NOT vote for sullivan the war pig.
Appears you have been paying too much attention to The View. Lots of deportations, led by self-deports, which is why the crime rate is way down and housing costs are down. MAHA is doing well. Ukraine and Russia are grinding one another into dust and happily, the US is no longer participating. Sullivan has done a lot to reopen the state to resource development despite the best efforts of the democrat / RINO legislative majorities to close it. Trump has ended a lot more wars than he has started, Even Iran, which has been murdering Americans for nearly half a century is no longer capable of doing so.
Question for you: What makes Israel any more criminal than, say the Biden or O’Bama regimes? Oh, that’s right, they are YOUR team. Please pass along my lack of regards to your buddies in the Peltola campaign and worst wishes for future success. Cheers –
Where are the prosecutions for Russiagate, election fraud, etc. ???
Anybody happy that Russians and Ukrainians are killing each other is a sick, demented individual. If you are so happy with the war then you need to choose a side and go and fight! Otherwise you are just a good-for-nothing coward.
Claiming that Trump has ended more wars then started is really stretching the truth and we have done nothing to harm Iran. Wake up!
Prosecutions for Russiagate are in process. Apparently you forgot (or ignored) the extreme partisanship of conservatives bringing these cases in the DC Circuit where you can always send a Republican to jail and always get a democrat off. The problem here is not failure to prosecute. Rather, it is failure to convict in a highly partisan circuit.
While awful, I am far less upset with Russia and Ukraine killing one another than you are. Think of it as the Not My Circus, Not My Monkey worldview. We didn’t start it. While we did not start it, we are trying to end it.
Name calling. How droll. I fought for a lot of years, How about you, you silly little girl?
Trump ended the following conflicts: Israel v Hamas, Israel v Iran, India v Pakistan, Congo v Rwanda, Cambodia v Thailand, Armenia v Azerbaijan, Egypt v Ethiopia, Serbia v Kosovo. Finally, he is well on his way to ending Iran v the Western World. You believe we have done nothing to harm Iran. You need to ask the IRGC how the current festivities are going for them, you silly little man. Cheers –
Anyone who is happy about Russians and Ukrainians killing each other is a sick, demented individual…
Thank you for your diagnosis! Can you please give your vaulted diagnosis of an individual who just doesn’t give one single F?
Asking for a friend.
Peltola has a long history of being in office. She’s always been about herself and not Alaskans. She’s never returned my calls to her office and she didn’t accomplish anything when she was I. The house.
Showing she is losing and doesn’t have the promise to make the time of these political consultants worthwhile spent trying to save her campaign when they have personal bills needing to be paid after Nov 7th. Wouldn’t make personal financial sense.
They’ll moving onto the next job assignment to keep their employment the next two-10 years.
Maybe he doesn’t want to get caught in the decoy dan scandal.
Look for Senator Chuckie Schumer and the DNSC to assume a broader role – if that is possible – in the Peltola campaign. Maybe a few people will recall how much the national Democrat clique likes to select candidates and establish party objectives. Kinda like the Politburo in the former Soviet Union; same ideas and pretty much the same sort of people.
The Little Squaw.ker from Bethel
was trying to make sexual advances on him, and McParland would have none of it.
Sexual harassment. Desperate Mary. Decoy Dan. The Democrats have a known quantum of tricks, deception, and fraud. It’s what they do. But, they are exposed, thanks to great investigators like Suzanne Downing. Democrats will eat their own as their desperation intensifies.
We’ve already voted for Sullivan at our house, but I try to look at campaign strategies and implementation objectively. I have to say that Peltola’s campaign is at least equal to Sullivan’s using the measurements I use. While I think that running on “fish” is both meaningless and silly, it’s not nearly as large a mistake as the Sullivan bear-with-one-shot ad; especially given the Al Gross debacle with much the very same ad. Peltola’s typical Alaskan talking heads in ads have been somewhat superior to those of her competition. She is the better speaker so far as presentation and authenticity (though I don’t believe what she says). I think she will lose in November, and I think the vote tomorrow will show have far under water she is, but if instead she is close to Sullivan in votes tomorrow night then we will see a very competitive race to the finish line.
Contrarian view: Mary did herself no favor by replacing the Alaska-centric Don Young team with McPartland. I don’t know if she can recover from her below-expectations, lackluster House experience, Losing Buzzy certainly exacerbated the problem. But the silver lining for Mary is that the shake-up offers the opportunity to reset for the general. If the public polling is accurate, the Democrats stand to emerge from tomorrow with a credible ticket going into November. People who understand that Alaska campaigns are best messaged by people with vast Alaska experience. Not the DNC, the DSCC or worse yet the DSA/Bernie crowd. Mary’s uphill climb could well be elevated by a well-managed, coordinated campaign. That said, I remain committed to Senator Sullivan’s re-election. He has a very strong skill set and a work ethic to match. He remains the higher quality candidate, and not by just a little. Perhaps a more competitive Mary will cause Dan to build a coalition that extends beyond the increasingly narrow Republican base. Alaska would benefit from two Senators for All Alaska.
Is this because MP rejected the National endorsement from K. Harris 2 days ago?
Who rejected Harris? Mary or McPartland?
Is the DNC upset by this?
Seems so.