Proposed USPS rule on mailing handguns could ease shipping barriers for Alaskans

 

By SUZANNE DOWNING

April 1, 2026 – The United States Postal Service is preparing to publish a proposed rule that could significantly change how firearms are shipped in the United States, with potentially outsized impact for Alaska residents who often rely on the mail as their primary connection to commerce.

The proposal, titled “Revised Mailing Standards: Firearms,” is scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on April 2, 2026, and would revise longstanding USPS restrictions on mailing handguns.

The change stems from a January opinion by the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, which concluded that the federal ban on mailing “pistols, revolvers, and other firearms capable of being concealed on the person” cannot be constitutionally applied to law-abiding citizens under the Second Amendment.

The prohibition dates back to 1927 and is codified in federal law, but the OLC determined that the blanket restriction burdens constitutionally protected arms without sufficient historical justification, particularly since USPS already allows certain long guns and handgun shipments by licensed dealers.

Under current USPS policy, private citizens generally cannot mail handguns. Only licensed manufacturers, dealers, or importers may ship them, and only under strict conditions. Rifles and shotguns face fewer restrictions. That policy has created particular challenges in Alaska, where many communities off the road system do not have access to private carriers such as UPS or FedEx, or where shipping through those carriers requires costly and time-consuming routing through regional hubs.

In many rural parts of Alaska, the local post office is the only practical way to send or receive goods. Residents who need to ship a handgun for repair, transfer ownership through lawful channels, or move personal property often must travel long distances to find a dealer willing to handle the shipment, or pay significantly higher freight costs. For subsistence hunters and residents who rely on firearms for predator protection or personal defense, those delays and expenses can be substantial.

The proposed rule would revise USPS mailing standards to allow lawful handgun shipments by eligible private citizens for legitimate purposes, including self-defense, hunting, target shooting, repairs, or relocation. The Postal Service would still require compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including interstate transfer requirements under the Gun Control Act and prohibitions on shipping firearms to prohibited persons. USPS is also expected to retain packaging, labeling, and delivery safeguards, such as secure packaging and possible adult-signature requirements.

The proposal would not change rules governing ammunition, which would remain restricted under existing hazardous-materials safety regulations. It also would not require private carriers to accept handgun shipments; many of those companies currently limit firearm shipments to licensed dealers only.

The proposed change follows litigation and constitutional analysis concluding that the nearly century-old mailing ban may no longer withstand Second Amendment scrutiny. Some states with stricter gun laws have opposed loosening the restriction, arguing that allowing handgun shipments through the mail could complicate enforcement of state regulations and increase the risk of unlawful trafficking.

The rule is only the first step in the regulatory process. Once published, it will be open for public comment before USPS considers a final version. Any final rule could take months and is likely to face legal challenges. Until a final rule is adopted, current USPS prohibitions on mailing handguns remain in place.

Latest Post

Comments

4 thoughts on “Proposed USPS rule on mailing handguns could ease shipping barriers for Alaskans”
  1. This article completely misses the root cause of the problem, which is policy changes made by UPS and FedEx regarding shipment of firearms. In June of 2022, UPS sent a letter to a company called Ghost Firearms, cancelling that company’s account and informing them that packages in the UPS system from that company “may be seized and destroyed”. https://armedamericannews.org/breaking-ups-cancelling-gun-dealers-accounts-destroying-packages-in-transit/. UPS’ reasoning for the change was to control shipments of parts for “ghost guns”. UPS ultimately decided to accept firearm shipments from FFL holders (licensed firearm dealers) only. Following pressure from anti-gun groups, mainly the Giffords Law Center, FedEx followed suit. Up until that point, both UPS and FedEx allowed private gun owners to ship handguns directly to FFL holders. For example, if a private individual had a handgun that failed under warranty, or was recalled for any reason, that individual could simply send the handgun directly to the manufacturer for repairs, and the manufacturer could send it directly back to the individual, since no transfer of ownership was taking place. Now, with the two major common carriers refusing individual shipments, a handgun owner has no choice but to go through a licensed gun dealer to ship a handgun, a service for which dealers charge a fee. When the handgun is returned to the owner, it must again go through a dealer, making for a very cumbersome process. Allowing handgun shipments through the mail would remove those burdensome requirements.

    1. That said, I don’t think the article “completely misses” anything. There are many reasons why this USPS rule change is of particular interest to Alaskans. Military people moving to Alaska can have a terrible time with their handguns if they don’t have time to take the ferry as Canada has gone full-Nazi/Commie on firearms and anything even remotely related to firearms. Legislators and (more frequently) legislative staffers driving to and from Juneau now have to ask someone using the ferry to take their guns, especially handguns. So this, and the federal court rulings telling the USPS that they cannot ban wearing of handguns on their property are a continuation of the Trump administration acknowledging the plain wording and clear meaning of the 2nd Amendment. Shall not be infringed.

      1. I didn’t say the change wouldn’t help Alaskans. I said that the push to change the rule was caused specifically by the policy changes made by UPS and FedEx, which the article doesn’t mention. Also, the article makes it sound very much as if access to those carriers would allow remote village residents to ship handguns; it would not. They would still need access to an FFL, which is my point.

  2. No more “going postal.”
    Ground zero for mass shootings started at the US Postal Service Centers. It was a “thing” back in the 80’s and 90’s.
    Working at the Post Office meant you were in jeopardy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support
The Alaska Story

Your support allows us to stay independent and continue documenting stories that deserve to be seen and matter.

Keep The Alaska Story Alive