By JIM MINNERY | ALASKA FAMILY COUNCIL

Alaska Senate Bill 90, legislation introduced by Sen. Cathy Giessel of Anchorage, represents a dangerous overreach that undermines the fundamental rights of parents to guide their children’s healthcare decisions. While proponents may claim this bill helps teens access needed mental health services, it actually creates a system where minors can receive ongoing treatment behind their parents’ backs—with potentially devastating consequences.

What SB 90 Actually Does

Under this bill, 16 and 17-year-olds could consent to up to five mental health treatment sessions without any parental knowledge or approval. But the problems don’t stop there. After those initial sessions, a mental health provider could continue treating the minor indefinitely—still without involving parents—if the provider decides three things: that the teen wouldn’t get treatment if parents knew, that telling parents would harm the child’s wellbeing, and that the minor is “mature” enough to make these decisions alone.

This gives mental health providers extraordinary power to override parental authority based entirely on their own judgment.

The Real-World Dangers

Consider the risks this creates. A gender clinic could use these provisions to begin socially transitioning a child through mental health counseling—all without parental involvement. From there, the provider could recommend irreversible transition drugs and even surgeries without parental guidance or even knowledge.

Think this isn’t happening ? Think again.

In just the past few days, attorneys have discovered “irrefutable evidence that the [California Department of Education] covertly moved…unconstitutional gender secrecy directives inside a password-protected training hidden away from public view, and distributed them to school districts statewide.” Public school counselors, teachers and other taxpayer-funded school officials were actively deceiving parents and, as it turns out, a Federal judge. The attorney noted “This is one of the most egregious attempts I’ve seen — if not the most — to mislead a Court, and it warrants severe sanctions.”

We have plenty of evidence these kind of manipulative, secretive “transitions” are happening all over the country in public schools including right here in Alaska. Giessel’s bill would put even more parents in the dark.

SB 90 also raises grave concerns for parents whose children may be considering an abortion. By allowing older minors to seek mental health counseling in secret and giving providers broad discretion to withhold information from parents, the bill creates a pathway for a teen to receive abortion-related counseling—or referrals—without any parental knowledge. Mental health providers could determine that involving parents would be “harmful,” and therefore continue counseling the minor about pregnancy, options, and next steps without ever notifying the family.

This undermines long-standing parental-consent and parental-notification expectations that exist precisely because decisions surrounding pregnancy and abortion carry profound medical, emotional, and moral consequences. SB 90 risks cutting parents out at the very moment when their guidance, support, and protection are most essential.

These aren’t hypothetical concerns. SB 90 is a roadmap that makes these choices frighteningly easy to follow.

Why Parents Must Be Involved

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that parents’ interest in directing the care and upbringing of their children is among our most fundamental constitutional rights. There’s a good reason for this protection.

When we distinguish between children and adults in the law, we do so because children lack the maturity, experience, and judgment needed for life’s difficult decisions. As the Supreme Court noted in Parham v. J.R., parents “possess what a child lacks” in making these complex choices. This is especially true for mental healthcare, where decisions can have lifelong consequences.

Parents know their children’s full medical history, their struggles, and their needs in ways no provider meeting them for the first time ever could. The constitutional right to direct children’s care—including medical and mental healthcare—belongs to parents for this very reason.

Who Really Knows What’s Best?

Parents love their children in ways that no mental health provider or government bureaucrat can match. When a child faces mental or emotional challenges, parents are best positioned to guide them through those difficulties with compassion and wisdom gained from years of knowing their child intimately.

That’s exactly why parents must be informed immediately when such issues arise. Hiding information about a child’s mental health from parents doesn’t protect the child—it cuts off the very people most equipped and motivated to help them.

The Bottom Line

Mental health providers should never hide information about a child’s wellbeing from parents. Before any treatment of a minor’s mental or emotional health begins, the provider should obtain prior written consent from parents who can contribute crucial context from their child’s complete medical history.

SB 90 gets this exactly backward. Instead of supporting families, it enables providers to exclude them. Instead of protecting children, it exposes them to potentially harmful decisions made without the guidance of those who know and love them best.

Alaska’s parents have both a constitutional right and a moral responsibility to direct their children’s healthcare. SB 90 violates that right and should be rejected.

Tell Senator Giessel to Respect Parental Rights

The best way to put an end to this egregious violation of parental rights is to let Senator Cathy Giessel now how concerned we are. Most legislators don’t see the light until they feel the heat. Let’s let her know how hot we are about this piece of legislation that so blatantly disrespects the God-given, fundamental right of Alaskan parents to guide their children’s lives and to responsibly direct every aspect of their education and care – including mental health care.

CLICK HERE to email Senator Giessel or call her office today at 907-269-0181 and tell her you oppose SB 90.

Legal citations: Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 (2000); Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253, 265 (1984); Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584, 602 (1979); PJ ex rel. Jensen v. Wagner, 603 F.3d 1182, 1197 (10th Cir. 2010); Kanuszewski v. Michigan Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs., 927 F.3d 396, 419 (6th Cir. 2019).

8 thoughts on “Jim Minnery: Senate Bill 90 is a threat to parental rights”
  1. We have it very good in America. We’ve solved all major problems and now we are searching for things to do up at the legislature office.
    No to this bill.

    1. Start by attending and actively participating in your local neighborhood council
      being polite and discreet about your differences in politics with the other council members don’t come across threatening
      Work your way up

      *Fixing a crumbling foundation is where to begin before trying to save a building, it’s the same with a community and governance go back to the basics go back to the Community council and flip it from left to right

  2. Something has gone seriously WRONG with Senator Giessel! From helping organize the Senate to be controlled by Democrats to offering leftist, radical anti-family bills.
    SAD!!!

  3. They have the votes to pass it including the votes to override Gov Dunleavy
    The only way for it to be stopped is their voter supporters (Democrats and Moderates) need to call them and convince them otherwise

    *AKGop a new year us coming up and it’s time to elect a new Chair who’ll actually direct and lead Leadership who have large egos

  4. Interesting that Cathy did not propose this when her kids were in school. Sadly, she doesn’t seem concerned about her grandchildren under this.

    Somewhere along the line, as the legislature, the public schools and the public health apparat replace parental rights and responsibilities with their own foolish notion of propriety, in this case, medical mutilation via scalpel, drugs or counseling, some non-zero number of parents will react poorly, taking out displeasure on the perpetrators. I expect it will be difficult to get a conviction afterwards.

    I don’t think that is a particularly appropriate response, but should the political left keep this foolishness up, they are all but guaranteeing such a response in the not so distant future, a response they will be shocked, simply shocked at. Cheers –

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *