Alexander Dolitsky: The new mosaic of Islam and the future of Western democracy

 

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

March 9, 2026 – A few years ago, I flew Emirates Airlines from Seattle to Thailand with a layover in Dubai (UAE). It’s a grueling 14.5-hour non-stop trek; and most of fellow passengers in this flight were headed to the Middle East or India.

My seatmate was a middle-aged Saudi man, and given the length of the flight, we eventually struck up a conversation. During our talk, he confidently told me that it’s only a matter of time before the entire world converts to Islam. “We have patience,” he concluded with pride.

“Not any time soon, my friend,” I replied, turning away from him for the rest of the journey.

Today, those of us who travel to Europe frequently, probably noticed a remarkable influx of Muslim population in West European countries, such as France, England, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, etc. As a result of it, the demographic landscape of Western Europe is shifting, with a marked increase in Muslim immigrants and their families in major cities. This influx has prompted discussions about integration challenges, with many Muslim populations forming insular, tight-knit communities that coexist alongside within traditional European nations, rather than fully blending and assimilating into European Judeo-Christian social structures.

Before I left the ethnically homogeneous Europe for the United States in 1978, European nations were defined by distinct, traditional cultural identities: French in France, Italians in Italy, Germans in Germany, Danish in Denmark. Today, however, the continent is experiencing profound cultural disruption, with rising Islamic influence and Sharia law, creating a system that seems incompatible with traditional European values. This raises a crucial question: why has Europe undergone such a rapid and profound demographic shift and cultural transformation in just over half a century.

Historically, Islam has been a part of the Russian Empire for over 500 years, with significant populations in the Volga River region, Caucasus Mountains and Central Asia, making it the second-largest religion after Orthodox Christianity. Following the 16th-century conquests of Eastward territories, policies shifted from forced conversion to managed toleration by Catherine the Great in the 18th century, establishing the state-regulated Muslim authorities.

In fact, Islam in the Volga River region began with the official conversion of Volga Bulgaria to Islam in 922 AD, driven by Khan Almış to secure political independence and trade, preceding the total Christianization of Kievan Rus, a Slavic State along the Dnieper River in today’s Ukraine. It remains a major, historically rooted faith in the region, particularly among Tatars and Bashkirs in Tatarstan and Bashkortostan.

Islam established an early foothold in Caucuses Mountains, including Dagestan, Chechnya and Ingushetia during the 8th century AD. The Russian state began absorbing significant Muslim populations in 1552, marked by the Tsar Ivan IV’s conquest of Kazan in the south of European Russia.

During the 18th century, Russian policy toward Muslims shifted from coerced conversion to controlled tolerance. While pre-Catherine the Great policies favored forced assimilation, Catherine the Great implemented religious tolerance in 1773 and subsequently established the Orenburg Muslim Spiritual Assembly in 1788 to bring Islamic institutions under state regulation.

By the end of the 19th century, the Russian Empire boasted a significant Muslim population of 14–20 million, which had grown from a much smaller base, when the total Russian imperial population was around 35–40 million in 1800, reaching over 125 million by the 1897 census. The Tsarist government typically allowed Muslim communities to manage their own religious affairs autonomously, provided they maintained loyalty to the imperial authorities.

While some Muslim groups actively resisted Russian rule, others were absorbed into the imperial bureaucracy. During the late 19th century, Jadidism emerged as an intellectual movement advocating for modernization, educational reform and social renewal among Russian Muslims. Upon taking the throne in 1881, Tsar Alexander III adopted a Russification policy that increased persecution of Muslims, systematically pushing them to the fringes of Russian society.

Following the 1917 October Socialist Revolution, the Soviet state engaged in a systematic campaign to eradicate Islam, viewing it as an archaic and backward force to socialist modernization. Particularly, during the 1920s and 1930s, this policy included the Hujum (“attack” or “assault”) on women’s veiling, the widespread closure of mosques and the seizure of religious endowments. While theoretically allowing for freedom of conscience, the state actively worked to replace Islamic practices with state-sanctioned secular, socialist modernity.

In short, early Soviet anti-Islamic policy (1920s–1930s) involved aggressive state actions to dismantle religious foundations. This included abolishing Sharia courts, banning traditional schooling and launching campaigns against the paranja (veil).

Under Joseph Stalin ruling, the 1930s saw a brutal crackdown on Islam, with thousands of mosques closed and many clergy executed or jailed. However, in 1943, Stalin shifted tactics to gain wartime support, establishing a state-controlled Islamic hierarchy to monitor believers and project a false image of religious freedom to the world.

Despite official repression, many Islamic customs such as circumcision and traditional marriage persisted underground, as the campaign failed to fully replace Muslim identity with Marxist-Leninist ideology. While official state atheism remained, the repression was less intense after the Nikita Khrushchev era (1953-1964). Local authorities in Muslim republics sometimes turned a blind eye to unregistered religious activities.

In short, Soviet policies created a split, where central authorities deemed Islam as a threat, yet it remained deeply embedded in local culture, resulting in a persistent, low-level conflict rather than total erasure. During my 1973 archaeological work in the Soviet Central Asia (Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan), I observed that Islam was practiced openly and proudly, deeply intertwined with traditional values.

Western nations must now consider examining historical Russian and Soviet strategies for managing Muslim populations and integration as they navigate current, large-scale Muslim migration into traditional Judeo-Christian societies. This approach suggests analyzing past Eurasian methods of dealing with Islamic communities to inform modern policy in Europe and Americas.

Americans and Europeans policy makers and scholars should investigate how the historical Russian and Soviet approaches to Islam can inform strategies for managing the current, intense migration of Muslims into Western nations. As Western nations face high levels of Muslim immigration, they should consider adopting lessons from the historic Russian and Soviet experiences in managing Islamic communities.

Indeed, today’s Western leaders need to analyze the Russian and Soviet historical models for dealing with Islamic populations to better manage migration into traditional Judeo-Christian societies, navigating security implications and addressing the challenges posed by increased migration in Europe and the United States.

The author was born and raised in the former Soviet Union before settling in the U.S. in 1978. He moved to Juneau in 1986 where he taught Russian studies and Archaeology at the University of Alaska Southeast, and Social Studies Teacher at the Alyeska Central School of the Alaska Department of Education. From 1990 to 2022, he served as a director and president of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center, publishing in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology and ethnography. Find him on Amazon.com.

Alexander Dolitsky: Greenland’s future in geopolitics, resources, and sovereignty

Alexander Dolitsky: Assimilating to the dominant culture is a vital requirement

Latest Post

Comments

18 thoughts on “Alexander Dolitsky: The new mosaic of Islam and the future of Western democracy”
  1. How about this: whites occupy 15% of the earth’s landmass. How about they stay home and fix their own problems on the other 85%?
    I didn’t buy a pricey home in a nice neighborhood with little crime only to hear blaring and wailing from a loudspeaker, reports of school girls being raped, and Sharia law governing my life. That’s the goal of every Muslim per the Quran.
    There, I said it.

  2. > Judeo-Christian societies

    That concept is a fallacy. Those two theologies are distant and separate.

    There are Christian societies and Judaic ones. This country was founded as a Christian country and God willing will return to being a Christian country.

  3. My opinion … Islam and Islamist will never assimilate into our western way of life and do not belong here.
    I base this opinion on the following facts from the book they wholeheartedly worship:
    13 Doctrines of Islam (as per the Qur’an):
    1. (65:4) You can rape, marry and divorce pre-pubescent girls.
    2. (4:3, 4:24, 33:50) You can enslave for sex and work.
    3. (4:34) You can beat women.
    4. (24:4) You will need 4 Muslim male witnesses to prove rape.
    5. (9:29) Kill Jews and Christians if they do not convert or pay Jizya tax.
    6. (8:12, 47:4) Crucify and amputate non-Muslims.
    7. (9:111) You will kill non-Muslims to receive 72 virgins in heaven.
    8. (2:217, 4:89) You will kill anyone who leaves Islam.
    9. (8:12, 47:4) You will behead non-Muslims.
    10. (9:5) You will kill and be killed for Al’llah.
    11. (8:12, 8:60) You will terrorize non-Muslims.
    12. (Chapter-8) Steal from the non-Muslims.
    13. (3:54, 9:3, 16:106, 40:28 … “Taqiyya” deception) Lie to strengthen Islam.
    There’s absolutely ‘no-way’ anyone can convince me there’s any meaningful benefit having Islam and/or Islamist’s as a part of our western society. With their unhinged mindset, they will never change in their hearts – minds, especially when the very book they worship brainwashes them into ‘brutally’ enslaving // eliminating // conquering the infidels.

  4. Alexander,
    I would have asked the airline crew that you needed to change seats on that plane. How in the world could you sit next to a thoroughly brainwashed zealot Muslim for 14.5 hours? Go business class next time.🙏

    1. Brystole, it was 5-6 years ago. I visit Thailand every year, but I stopped flying Emirates Airlines; mostly Korean or Japanese business class–excellent service.

  5. Alexander, thanks for an interesting article. I appreciate your experience and historical knowledge. Your views and opinions regarding mass muslim migration are seemingly complex. In a previous article, “Assimilating to the dominant culture is a vital requirement”, you pointed out that countries like Poland, Hungary and Slovakia have successfully resisted muslim mass migration. To my knowledge, those countries remain strongly Christian. In this piece, you speak of mass muslim migration almost as a force of nature, that we cannot change, and so must simply deal with. However, there is much evidence that this mass migration is not an organic trend, but a globalist push, the goal being the destabilization you speak of in that previous article. What would you say to those of us who believe that America can be like Poland, Hungary and Slovakia, resisting the trend altogether?

    1. John,
      For centuries, Islam and Christianity have coexisted within the borders of Russia and, later, the Soviet Union. As the Russian Empire expanded southward and eastward—annexing the Volga region, the Crimean Peninsula, and vast areas of Central Asia (including Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan)—it absorbed deeply rooted, native Muslim populations.

      These Muslim communities were not immigrants; they were indigenous inhabitants whose presence in these territories preceded Russian eastward expansion, often dating back to the 7th or 10th centuries. Consequently, the Russian state had to learn how to manage a large, diverse Muslim population, like the administrative challenges posed by managing other indigenous minorities.

      This process mirrors the westward expansion of the United States and the annexation of Native American lands, though the Russian context involved incorporating complex, pre-existing Islamic state structures (such as the Khanates) rather than just nomadic tribes. While this coexistence was sometimes marked by forced conversion in the 16th century, it shifted under Catherine the Great toward a more pragmatic, bureaucratic management of Islam through established institutions, such as the Orenburg Spiritual Assembly. This allowed the Russian Empire to incorporate these territories while navigating the complexities of a multi-religious, multi-ethnic empire

      The presence of Muslim populations in Western Europe and North America is the result of post-war immigration, not historical indigenous habitation. In response to the complexities of this demographic shift, several East European nations (such as Poland, Hungary, and Slovakia) adopted restrictive border policies. Conversely, Western European nations and the United States permitted immigration, resulting in settled, established communities.

      Given that a significant portion of the roughly 3.45 to 4.5 million Muslims in the US are citizens, and many are multi-generational, large-scale deportation is legally and practically unfeasible. Consequently, the focus shifts to integration and management within the framework of Western laws and Judeo-Christian principles, which emphasize freedom of religion, individual dignity, and the rule of law.

      How to effectively manage this integration while balancing differing cultural values—such as those regarding gender roles and religious freedom—remains a complex challenge for which there is no easy consensus. How this can be done? I do not know.

  6. Thank you for educating us about these hot global topics, Alexander. I feel like I’m getting an advanced History lesson from a very skilled and knowledgeable professor.

  7. I have an open question: Based on current political and demographic trends, both nationally and internationally, WHO is supposed to assimilate? The host, or the guest? The assimilator, or the assimilatee?
    Alexander?????

    1. Good questions, ChrissyB. I do not have a simple answer.
      As a Jewish native of the former Soviet Union, I left the country as a political refugee in 1977, renouncing my citizenship. After a year in limbo in Italy and Austria, I arrived in the U.S. in 1978, becoming a US citizen in 1983. So, I had to acculturate several times in my life; otherwise, I would not be accepted by a foreign society.

      To answer your questions, this situation presents three primary outcomes:

      (1) Newcomers/immigrants must pursue acculturation and eventual assimilation to avoid significant cultural friction. Newcomers face obstacles and cross-cultural difficulties if they fail to assimilate into the host culture.

      (2) Newcomers/conquering groups must establish mechanisms to govern indigenous or established populations under a new, imposed framework (Europeans vs. Native Americans; Russians vs. Native Muslims). Imposed regimes must enforce their rules over existing societies (e.g., historical settler colonialism).

      (3) Conquered populations are forced to choose between submission, continuous resistance, or displacement/migration. Yes, conquered societies face a bleak choice: submit, resist with high risk, or relocate.

      Unfortunately, these patterns are deeply embedded in history. Sad, but true.

      1. A great scholarly answer. Thank you. Your personal journey demonstrates success through #1. Hard work, determination and the ability to integrate into the system which the host body standardized, is the path of least resistance and offers the greatest rewards. Unfortunately, the US has taken a backward turn through the efforts of Democrats and progressives, by cultivating a culture in which the host must assimilate to the ways of the newly arrived. And this is one of the primary causes of why our country is so politically divided today.

        1. ChrissyB,
          I recently submitted my article, ‘The Future of Islam and the West: Clash of Civilizations or Peaceful Coexistence?’, to Alaska Story. Upon publication, it will address many of the concerns and frustrations currently being addressed by you.

          While every historical era presents unique obstacles, humanity consistently demonstrates the resilience to survive, adapt, and eventually thrive.

          1. Can’t wait to read it. Thank you again, Alexander. Your contributions to Suzanne are top tier, scholarly examinations of the world we live in. What a joy to have you writing for Alaska Story.

  8. Large scale deportation may appear legally and practically unfeasible, but it is not impossible. Being a muslim is completely contradictory to being an American citizen. Current rulings in Texas declaring CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood to be terrorist organizations are a good start. However, these same groups are still seeking to hijack government school curriculum to declare that the Alamo was an Islamic shrine, to eliminate Thanksgiving, George Washington, and other nonsense. Sharia law was just rejected by 95% vote in Texas. We have had too many traitors in high office like Obama, who is part of the Jihad, or the Bush family and the current crop in Minnesota who love to take their money.

    1. James, my educated guess is that the US Supreme Court will be reluctant to rule for deportation of the US citizens based on their ethnicity and religious affiliation; illegal immigrants—yes, US citizens—no.

  9. James, my educated guess is that the US Supreme Court will be reluctant to rule for deportation of the US citizens based on their ethnicity and religious affiliation; illegal immigrants—yes, US citizens—no.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support
The Alaska Story

Your support allows us to stay independent and continue documenting stories that deserve to be seen and matter.

Keep The Alaska Story Alive