By BRETT HUBER
March 22, 2026 – Let’s cut through the noise on Senate Bill 64: It doesn’t come close to fixing Alaska’s broken election system so much as it props it up.
This bill is lipstick on the pig that is Ranked-Choice Voting, an abomination already infecting Alaska’s elections. The bill makes no attempt to fix the real problem.
Alaskans are frustrated, confused, and fed up with RCV, and instead of repealing it, SB 64 tries to tweak around the edges while quietly handing more power to government insiders. SB 64 avoids the problem altogether.
Then there’s the dangerous aspect nobody’s talking about: SB 64 shifts even more control over elections to the next governor and unelected bureaucrats in the Division of Elections.
Rather than empowering voters, it empowers people behind closed doors.
Why I oppose Senate Bill 64, the election bill that Democrats love
Remember, we have no idea who the next governor and lieutenant governor will be. Or the next one after that. So why on earth would we lock in more centralized authority now? Why would we give a blank check on election control to someone we haven’t even elected yet?
Then there’s the data … if you can even call it that.
SB 64 leans on questionable sources, Outside influence, and numbers that don’t reflect the reality Alaskans are seeing at the ballot box. What Alaskans see is ballots getting tossed. Races and elections dragging on due to ranked-choice voting. Voters confused about how their vote actually gets counted.
Instead of admitting the system is flawed, the sponsors of SB 64 are doubling down with half-baked “fixes” backed by shaky analysis and who-knows-what funding sources.
Let’s be honest: This isn’t about improving elections. SB 64 is all about protecting RCV from being repealed.
Because the people pushing SB 64 know something: They know if Alaskans get a clean, up-or-down vote on RCV, it’s history.
So this bill gives political cover. It lets them say, “Hey, we fixed it,” while keeping the same badly broken system in place.
Alaskans deserve better than that and should expect more from our lawmakers. Because if a system is confusing, untrusted, and built on questionable data, you don’t patch it. You scrap it.
SB 64 prolongs the real problem. And worse, it concentrates power in ways that should concern everyone, no matter where you stand politically.
If you want election integrity, transparency, and real accountability, there’s a simple answer:
Don’t dress it up, tweak it, or put lipstick on it. Repeal it.
Brett Huber is state director for Americans for Prosperity-Alaska and a longtime Alaskan.
4 thoughts on “Brett Huber: SB 64 is lipstick on the pig of ranked-choice voting”
RCV is an electronic voting system owned by Dominion (yes, THAT Dominion). Dominion is the ONLY company that can administer an RCV election. Dominion is the ONLY company that can AUDIT an RCV election.
That’s too much power in 1 set of hands. On top of which there’s information coming out that implicates Dominion with Serbian operatives connecting via the Internet and doing vote tally manipulations. I’m done with the shell game that is RCV.
Not Only that but Iran has a hand in our elections. They are understandably pissed at us war-wise, and they have supported local cells (especially in the Valley) that want to turn voter’s attention towards fear- based topics like the SAVE Act, RCV, and the LNG pipeline proposal. Iranian special agents aren’t wearing burkas – you can’t recognize them by appearance but they have commandeered small efforts like specific marketing campaigns at Freddy’s to buy Halal orange juice from Florida and succulent date production messaging that supports Bedouin farmers. It’s subtle and weak and Alaskans are discerning, but just an fyi. It’s not obvious.
No surprise that government dependents chose a government dependent R representative they think still is on good standing with Republicans as a whole (because they don’t yet see her in the same camp as R’s as Sumner, Rufferidge, Stutes, Von Imof, Sarah Rasmussen) when she (Mia Costello) presented that bill here last week
Anything presented by her that camp of government dependent republicans you can’t trust. AKGOP has a lot of work ahead of itself developing discernment in who’s for the Republican Party’s governance model and who within it are (actively) working against it.
Alaska: Is it time to put a fork in it? 🍴
.
Another 💩💩🥪 made in Juneau for you and me.