District O Republicans advance three names to replace Sen. Mike Shower. Who are they?

Mat-Su Republicans have completed the first step in replacing Sen. Mike Shower, who resigned earlier this fall to run for lieutenant governor. On Friday night, District O precinct leaders met to vote on which nominees they will formally forward to the governor.

After the balloting was tallied, the top three finishers emerged:

  • Rep. Kevin McCabe – 33 votes

  • Rep. George Rauscher – 33 votes

  • Ryan Sheldon – 24 votes

Other candidates received support but did not make the final cut, including Todd Smoldon (21 votes), Doug Massie (3), and Steve Menard (0).

Under state law, Gov. Mike Dunleavy must appoint one of the top three names, after which the nominee must be confirmed by the Senate.

The confirmation hurdle is likely to be tense.

With Sen. Shower’s resignation — and now Sen. Shelley Hughes formally stepping down to focus on her gubernatorial bid — the conservative bloc in the Senate has been reduced to just four Senate members:

  • James Kaufman

  • Mike Cronk

  • Rob Yundt

  • Robb Myers

These four are the remainder of the Republican minority.

Meanwhile, the majority coalition — Republicans who joined with Democrats — retains firm control and will effectively determine whether the governor’s appointment is approved or rejected.

The coalition’s key members include:

  • Bert Stedman

  • Gary Stevens

  • Jesse Bjorkman

  • Cathy Giessel

  • Kelly Merrick

These five senators, who left the Republican majority to join with Democrats, control the numbers necessary to shape the outcome. They have already used their coalition power to advance priorities such as bigger state budgets, efforts to revive defined-benefit pension plans, and other left-leaning policy agendas.

With Hughes now gone, conservatives lose another reliable confirmation vote, giving the coalition even more leverage over who fills Shower’s seat.

Gov. Dunleavy is expected to make his appointment in the coming days, but the Senate will not vote on confirmation until the Legislature gavels in on Jan. 21.

Until then, District O — stretching across parts of the Mat-Su’s fastest-growing communities — remains under-represented in the Senate, and the upcoming confirmation vote is poised to become one of the first major power plays of the 2026 session.

Depending on which nominee the governor selects, the coalition majority could:

  • Approve the governor’s choice,

  • Reject the nominee in secret ballot, or

  • Procedurally force the process to restart — prolonging the vacancy and testing the limits of the governor’s appointment authority.

Two Senate resignations, one big Mat-Su mess

5 thoughts on “District O Republicans advance three names to replace Sen. Mike Shower. Who are they?”
  1. For a young family. Alaska is facing uncertain intimidating future. If the AKGOP loses more seats in the House, Senate, and loses the Governor office.

    Don’t ask not expect your teenager GenAlpha and young adult to stay on Alaska or to return, you tell them get their trade certificates and get out of Alaska or leave to get their trade certificates and you as parent go with them
    So they can have a REAL life and have the chance to start a family and raise their children on a more prosperous state because that state doesn’t live off taxes.

    The smarter GenAlpha’s and GenZers won’t return to Alaska there is nothing here for them

  2. At least we have one reason to be grateful for the Wayback Machine, namely to create receipts. I’ve read that Shower’s resignation was effective last month and Hughes’s resignation was effective last week. The following captures show them still listed on the legislature’s website on November 15 as sitting senators:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20251115182237/https://akleg.gov/senate.php
    https://web.archive.org/web/20251115182623/https://www.akleg.gov/basis/Member/Detail/34?code=sho
    https://web.archive.org/web/20251115182711/https://www.akleg.gov/basis/Member/Detail/34?code=hus

    So who’s actually running things at Legislative Affairs or the Legislative Council? I hope I’m just asking that rhetorically and not looking for a real answer. I remember a discussion with a LIO employee (FWIW, a member of a prominent Democrat family) years ago. When I questioned the factual accuracy of information published by the legislature, her retort was “What does it matter?”. Postscript: the answer came a short while later. James Brooks, in his story on the death of Chris Birch, had to retract a statement based on cherry-picking something published by the legislature! Surprise, surprise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *