By Suzanne Downing 
Eaglexit, the long-running grassroots campaign to separate Assembly District 2 from the Municipality of Anchorage and form an independent borough, has reached a pivotal milestone: The full petition package has been submitted to the Alaska Local Boundary Commission for its informal technical review.
The submission begins the formal detachment process and lays out the blueprint for what would become the Chugach Regional Borough, a new, non-unified home rule borough made up of Eagle River, Chugiak, Birchwood, Eklutna, and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson.
According to Eaglexit, the package meets all requirements under AS 29.06 and 3 AAC 110 and includes:
-
A home rule charter describing the proposed borough’s structure and powers
-
A map defining the exact borders
-
A transition plan detailing how the new government would be implemented
-
A legal brief addressing the statutory authority and case for separation
-
A financial analysis concluding that detachment would not increase overall costs for residents and would result in lower local taxes
The submission caps years of preparation by Eaglexit volunteers and signals the most advanced stage the movement has reached since its inception.
Eaglexit leaders say the fundamental goal is simple: Return local decision-making to the local community.
“We are turning Alaska’s promise of local self-government into practice,” said Catherine Margolin, chair of Eaglexit. “A lean, responsive government will be right here at home—easy to reach, quick to listen, and making decisions based on what our community needs and wants, not what distant officials think is best.”
Supporters believe detachment would create stronger fiscal accountability. Taxes collected in the Chugach Regional Borough would fund local services directly, with what they seek: smaller, more efficient government. The group also says that preserving local identity of the community is critical. Eagle River–area communities could prioritize local businesses, events, culture, and land-use decisions. The new borough would have the authority to adopt pro-business policies and growth plans tailored to the area’s need.
The detachment would leave Anchorage without a big chunk of its property tax budget, as many high-value homes are located in the Eagle River-Chugiak area. The total may be in the $65 million range, based on an analysis in 2022 that had the total Anchorage property tax remittances at $380 million, so the proportional hit could be 15–20% of Anchorage’s property taxes being redirected.
A major part of the proposal is the creation of a Chugach Regional Borough School District, a charter-based public school system. The district would include 14 schools: ten elementary, two middle, and two high schools. All schools would operate as public charter schools, designed to give parents and local administrators more authority. Decision-making would “flow up from the schools and community,” rather than down from a centralized administrative office.
Eaglexit also advises that a standalone borough could more effectively manage public safety, road maintenance, snow removal, and other core services, areas where residents often voice frustration with Anchorage’s broader priorities.
The LBC now has up to 45 days to conduct its informal technical review and either approve the package or request revisions.
If the petition clears this step, Eaglexit will begin a signature-gathering campaign among voters in Eagle River, Chugiak, Birchwood, and Eklutna. A successful signature drive would advance the question toward a public vote—potentially the most consequential local self-governance decision in the region’s history.
“We believe in trusting local voices, embracing local leadership, and realizing the full potential of the home rule model in Alaska,” Margolin said. “We urge all citizens who believe it is time for independence to join this effort.”
The detachment movement has been active for several years but has never before submitted a full, technically complete petition to the state making this filing its biggest leap toward the ballot box. The group can be reached at this link.
The Chugiak/Eagle River movement for self determination started in 1975, 50 years ago. We were to small and unorganized. It was easier to lean on the MOA. Over the 50 years of growth, Chugiak/Eagle River has out grown Anchorage. The only Conservative Anchorage Assembly member is from Chugiak/Eagle River. As they are typically. Anchorage may have their sales tax to go along with their Street People. Chugiak/Eagle River will rank in the top five most populous Communities in Alaska. I have waited 50 years for this remarkable event. Thank you to all who made this possible.
Best of luck Eaglexit. You’ll get out from the thumb of the liberal spending Municipality of Anchorage.
To be honest I disagree with the Eagleexit
But also I’d liked to witness the aftermath
How will Anchorage Muni respond without Eagleriver-Chugiak-Birchwood-Peterscreek? And can those communities maintain its more Red control into the next generation that fueled the exit by younger half of boomers and GenX or will it be short lived as GenAlpha, GenZ young adults and Millennials or GenY are aging whom been educated by a public school and influenced to turn to government for all their answers?
*I think current Anchorage city leaders in zoning and real estate planners may think about making Girdwood becoming New Eagleriver where there look to make an increase of higher value homes built on it to entice Anchorage government employees and higher waged private employees to buy
I doubt the city under its current leadership will become fiscally responsible.
Expect the assembly to spend lots of our tax dollars on litigation to fight to maintain their CONTROL! And the keep sucking the lifeblood off the cas$h cow. They will make itas expensive as possible.” HOW DARE you peasants leave
our socialist utopia? You’re supposed to keep working for the glory of Socialist Labor!!”
An excellent opportunity to grow another bloated and corrupt bureaucracy.
Part of the complaint about socialism is that it gives citizens money they didn’t earn or deserve. In Alaska, this is called the Permanent Fund Dividend.
Wrong as usual, Mr. Singed.
.
The Permanent Fund Dividend is the implicit payment that Alaskans receive (or are supposed to receive) in exchange for having our mineral and sub-surface property rights stolen from us under our communistic state constitution.
It’s all one pool from which we drink.
BRAVO Eagle River! Distancing any relationship with the failing Anchorage is definitely the smart move here. I for one, as well as many others I personally know, are making similar plans and decisions in the very near future, as Anchorage continues its downward spiral into the abyss of failure and debauchery while errantly // ignorantly assuaging their feelings and emotions.
Since most of the Eagle River area residents work in Anchorage, and would suck up a bunch of Anchorage resources, I’d be in favor of a toll on the highway to collect money of people driving into Anchorage.
Please explain how ER residents or for that matter all the residents coming from the valley each day to work and shop “suck up a bunch of resources” (what resources exactly)? Most of the major roads in Anchorage are state roads and not the Muni’s responsibility. You have to clear snow and fix a pothole for everyone who lives there anyway? Everyone getting gas in the Municipality pays the $.10 gas tax the Muni levies on each gallon, regardless whether or not you live there.
As for the Glenn it is a state road!
A toll tax would be one more financial burden on the lower and middle income Alaskans using the Glenn to drive away and to Anchorage
A toll road tax would make the list of Anchorages government dependent Assembly Members
Plus the expanding Girdwood with more higher middle class and higher income homes
If I was corrupt those are two good ideas to increase the taxes on Girdwood to pay for Anchorage and a toll tax to use the Seward and Glenn coming in and out of Anchorage
Good grief what part of “these are state roads” do you people not get? The Municipality has NO jurisdiction to impose any kind of levy……. AND the Muni regularly points out that they are not responsible when the Glenn/Seward etc do not get plowed in a timely fashion.
Now, let’s have an Anchoragexit to divest Anchorage from the Municipality of Anchorage, so we can get our own, half-way decent city council. Just dreaming of the good old days when Anchorage wasn’t a sh*thole.
Anchor Away!! I know that’s not how you spell that, but how about just dissolving theASSembly??
So what you’re suggesting is to undo unification? Otherwise, it’s entirely unclear. The last remaining vestige of the old city/borough divide was the ML&P/Chugach divide and even that’s no more. What sort of new city did you have in mind? A few scattered neighborhoods east of Boniface and south of Northern Lights, and most of the area south of Abbott/Dimond, are the only areas in the Anchorage bowl still showing conservative voting patterns.
And sand lake
A council flipped
But the councils of the Boniface and Diamond and abbot are still leftist or liberal
Those who are Republican and conservative neighbors and voters need to start attending their councils to flip them
It doesn’t matter if a district has R voters when a community council officers are Majoroty Blue it’s the left’s voices heard during meetings
Oddly enough, Anchorage residents support EaglExit more than Eagle River residents. The Save Anchorage folks including Jamie Allard will have to find other things to whine about! They can hire any librarian they want and burn as many books as they can.
“Oddly enough, Anchorage residents support EaglExit more than Eagle River residents”
Vince and you know this exactly how?
Also please name the occasion where Save Anchorage or any other CH/ER entity burned books?
I suppose you are like the librarians at our city owned library. They created a “banned books” category for patrons to check out. This of course is idiotic. If you can offer, check out, buy in any books store or on line the various titles they placed into that category, then by definition these books are NOT banned.
I wish people would have a better understanding of history. Book banning and burning were real and terrible and have been around since there was written material. From the burning of the library in Alexandria to the destruction of ancient Greek texts and books in the middle ages, to the burning of the Koran, the Bible and the Torah. The list is endless. Most egregious recent examples are Germany in the 1930’s, where mostly titles by Jewish authors were condemn to the pyre. Then we have the old Soviet Union and countries behind the iron curtain, where authors of books critical of the workers paradise, were routinely shipped of to Siberia. If their works were famous in the West, they were placed under house arrest and their works could not be printed, disseminated or even owned by anyone. You had people risking their lives to smuggle books like George Orwell “1984” or “Animal Farm” behind the iron curtain in an operation organized by western intelligence services. These services also provided underground operators with paper and printing presses, so they could print their own writings( like those from disbanded labor unions leaders especially in Poland).
Nothing I’ve read so far clarifies how the names “Chugach Regional Borough” and its school district would be viewed as distinct from the existing Chugach Census Area and Chugach School District. In the 1970 census, we had the Bristol Bay Borough and Bristol Bay Census Division, the latter eventually splitting into the Lake and Peninsula Borough and the Dillingham Census Area. It wasn’t as important a distinction at the time because Alaska didn’t have REAAs and the BIA still operated local schools in the villages.
Look, philosophically I think Eaglexit is a fantastic idea. The problem is, in reality it is a complete non-starter, as-in it will never happen.
Take a look at the list of requirements near the top of the article. It is impossible for Eaglexit to come even close to meeting the last requirement. Take schools for instance, in the article it talks all about how the new district will be run which sounds great, however they don’t mention a very important fact, the buildings and property that those schools currently occupy are owned by the Municipality of Anchorage, the entire MOA. Are they planning to buy those properties or build new? Either way how do they plan to do it without raising taxes?
The same thing applies to most Eagle River infrastructure i.e. Fire Stations , Fire fighting equipment, Snow removal and road maintenance equipment, ambulances, etc.
The MOA can’t legally give these things away.
Mark, you leave out a very important detail.
The MOA did not just GIVE residents in ER/CH schools etc. All ER/CH property owners pay property tax like everyone in Anchorage does. So technically a proportional part of EVERY school building, police station, firehouse, city hall etc, belongs to residents in the ER area, who paid taxes to the general fund to purchase all those things. What we need to figure out is the amount of contribution ER/CH has made vs all the buildings the MOA currently owns in the affected area. I wonder if the MOA will not owe the borough money when all is said and done. It is kind of like a divorce where each individual contributed to the marriage and assets are now divided up.
The new borough will levy taxes on residents.
(See above: “Supporters believe detachment would create stronger fiscal accountability. Taxes collected in the Chugach Regional Borough would fund local services directly, with what they seek: smaller, more efficient government. )
The projection is that current tax rates will not increase. You can do a lot with $65 million + , if you do not have to pay a large bureaucracy and extraneous city offices.
I honestly wish that was true, however it just isn’t. All of this property is owned by the MOA and and once any portion of the MOA leaves the MOA they are entitled to exactly zero MOA assets. That partial ownership is given up voluntarily by the area leaving.
Also, to add insult to injury, the MOA can’t legally give assets of value away, with some exceptions that don’t apply to Eaglexit.
Like I said, I really wish your post was correct because I thing it would do E.R., Chugach, etc. a world of good to be separated from Los Anchorage. However, the residents need to be aware of the huge price tag that is going to come with it.
There are also issues with them trying to separate JBER, discussion for another time perhaps.
Mark, your comment here betrays the fact that you know NOTHING about the Eagelexit movement, and have not researched it even slightly. Moreover, it displays an insultingly arrogant ignorance. Do you honestly believe the people behind Eaglexit have not thought of, researched and planned for the obvious aspect of the financial matters regarding separation from Anchorage? REALLY?
.’
The residents of Eagle River and Chugiak have a proportional ownership of ALL property within the municipality of Anchorage, and not just of the public property within Eagle River and Chugiak, by virtue of their payment of municipal taxes over the decades. As a result, the only problem associated with separation, in regard to public property, lies in the precise negociations over exactly how that property is equitably divided. Your argument against Eaglexit is both logically and morally specious, but it is exactly the kind of argument that I would expect an authority-loving radical leftist to take.
Reality is bringing a hard truth your way.
BTW, I do believe the people behind Eaglexit know exactly what I’m talking about, especially the board members.
Can you think of a reason they wouldn’t want to talk truthfully about this? Hint, it always comes down to money.
Mark, your comment here makes no sense.
.
What is it that you believe that the proponents and organizers of Eaglexit do not “want to talk truthfully about”? If you are referring to the property and financial aspects of separation from the marxist People’s Republic of Anchorage, they have discussed those matters in GREAT detail at many of their public meetings, and address those matters in detail on their website as well. But clearly, you have neither attended any of those public meetings, nor visited their website.
If they showed everyone that the MOA can’t just give all the infrastructure to the new borough, do you think they would still be getting donations?
There is no “proportional ownership”, the property is owned by the MOA, period. If Eaglexit happens, nearly a zero percent chance, the MOA will still own every bit of that property. Property the MOA cannot legally give away.
This myth of “proportional ownership” is just that, a myth.
Time will tell, it’s a bit of a moot point anyway, Eaglexit was unfortunately a non-starter from day one.
Mark, you are clearly both ignorant and dishonest.
.
Proportional municipal ownership IS a fact, as proven by other similar municipal secessions in other states. It is simply ignorant and laughable to suggest otherwise. You overlook the fact that Eagle River and Chugiak ARE PART OF the current Municipality of Anchorage, and therefore share in the ownership of all its resources. Property in the MOA is not entrusted to the Marxist Ten of the assembly majority and the mayor, despite your fervent desires to the contrary.
.
You are arguing from a position of both ignorance and stupidity. Stop wasting your time and ours already. Regardless, is could not be more obvious on whose side your sympathies lie, and that is with the Marxist Ten.
Well, I see you have no interest in be civil or honest.
So, I’m out.
Nice try, Mark.
So just for laughs let’s play out your assertion that all property is in essence owned by Anchorage proper as the administrative seat of the MOA.
If your claim were correct, it would logically follow that with the new Chugach Regional Borough CRB as an independent legal entity with taxing authority, the MOA would go from jurisdictional power to simple property owner, subject to taxation like any other property owner. There is no law that requires the CRB to use ANY of the MOA owned buildings. Many of the current schools for example are under capacity and consolidation makes a lot of sense.
I suppose there could be a negotiation of leasing in lieu of the MOA paying property tax and maintenance between MOA and CRB.
As for JBER, it has always been part of District 2 until just recently, when the downtown district gained another assembly seat. It was always part of the Eaglexit proposal, as many JBER families live in ER/CH area and their children attend schools there.
Furthermore if ER/CH have no claim to any property then they are by extension also released from payment towards any bonds that passed while they were a part of the MOA.
You pretty much nailed it actually. The MOA would become property owners in the CRB and would pay property taxes. However, if anyone thinks those property taxes are going to cover rent of those properties, they are nothing short of delusional.
CRB would have to buy or rent those properties (or build new which would be more expensive by orders of magnitude) either way it is going to be a huge taxpayer expense the Eaglexit board appears to be ignoring. As you say the could consolidate some but they would still have to buy or rent most of them. Also, it isn’t just the building and land, CRB wouldn’t own a single police car, fire truck, ambulance, road maintenance and snow removal equipment.
Do you really think the MOA is going to just turn over the tax base that is JBER? Or Eagle River/ Chugach for that matter. Plus, JBER/ DOD can simply say “no”.
As for the bonds, you are likely correct, I haven’t researched that angle. But the MOA would get the money anyway when CRB buy or rents those assets.
Like I’ve said ER/Chugach getting out from under the MOA would be fantastic for the people who live there, if it could be done in a realistic way. Unfortunately, it can’t.
My suggestion would be for folks to move out of the MOA, that’s what I did.
Mark, you keep making irrational and patently FALSE claims here, and so vehemently at that, that it makes me suspect that you are somehow connected to the MOA’s Marxist Ten, and are trying your damnedest to bad-mouth and undermine the Eaglexit movement.
.
You are COMPLETELY disingenuous in those claims, such as that there is no proportional ownership by the proposed Chugach Borough of MOA property that lies within that proposed borough (or, actually, proportional ownership of ALL MOA property by that proposed borough). In fact, this issue has already been both addressed and resolved by quite a number of other such municipal secessions around the country, and has been addressed AT LENGTH by the Eaglexit folks. Yet you ignore ALL of that, and continue to lie about it.
.
Your anti-Eaglexit propaganda here does bring up one sad and salient point, regarding Eaglexit, though, which your propaganda exemplifies: I have NO doubt whatsoever that the powers-that-be, both in Anchorage and in the state government and bureaucrazy, will go to any lengths to derail, attack and fight against the Eaglexit movement with all the considerable power at their command. Because rejecting tyranny strikes to the very core of power-hungry sociopaths, such as the MOA’s Marxist Ten. To not assume that they will fight Eaglexit tooth and nail is to be incredibly gullible and naive.
.
And one more thing: I feel no compulsion whatsoever to be civil toward those who maliciously lie and spread false information, as you have been doing here.
Mark, newsflash, the CH/ER area road maintenance is in a very large part contracted out, as all the funds for road services collected via property taxes in ER/CH to my knowledge STAY IN ER/CH and do NOT go into the general fund. Contracting is more efficient and cost-effective with great service to boot.
As for police, as a borough there are several options. There can be coverage via the AK state troopers, establishment of our own police force (we would not need a large department) or a contract with APD, similar to what Girdwood has with the Whittier PD. There is a volunteer fire department in Peter’s Creek and establishing more of those throughout the area (maybe each neighborhood) or contracting response with AFD. Property taxes collected should cover that as a primary function of government.
You claimed: “Do you really think the MOA is going to just turn over the tax base that is JBER? Or Eagle River/ Chugach for that matter. Plus, JBER/ DOD can simply say “no”.
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that Anchorage has a say here.
As for JBER, which is really not a tax base, but simply a fee payer in lieu of property tax, it depends on the their vote and Anchorage really has no say. JBER was always included in the proposal and they too get a choice. BTW when the new borough becomes reality the claim of the MOA towards ER/Chugiak tax base goes away as it no longer legally “belongs to the MOA” but to the new CRB, which would be the ENTIRE POINT of separation!
As for your claim that property taxes would not cover the cost of rental of MOA buildings, that is debatable, however having to maintain empty buildings is going to cost the ASD a ton of money, which they will have to do without any ER/CH contributions. Enjoy your increased taxation. Maybe that proportional ownership deal would not be so bad after all!
You seem to think that the folks at EaglExit just threw some ideas together and presented it to the commission. Your assertions could not be further from the truth. This process took years because these dedicated volunteers put countless hours and dollars into research, feasibility studies, lawyers public hearings and reviews, so that there are no surprises. Your insinuation that they are “hiding” things is insulting to them and the residents of the EaglExit area. I suggest you actually peruse the documentation available on their site.
Taxpayer,
“in large part” means MOA owns some part and ER/CH will not get that equipment for free. You are absolutely right that contracting those types of services is way more efficient than having gov’t do it.
The Troopers are highly unlikely to take up policing ER/CH, they are understaffed and stretched too thin as it is, that’s why they dumped Girdwood. As for contracting with the far left wing nuts running Anchorage, it would probably be cheaper to start from scratch. The point is this will be on more big cash outlay at day 1.
The entirety of the MOA doesn’t get to vote on it, but that in no way means they don’t have a say. The leftist assembly combined with our very left leaning high court judges will mean this is tied up in court for years, at least. And when it does end there is zero assurance Eaglexit will win, it will definitely cost them a butt load of money though. As for JBER, what borough they are in isn’t up to voters, the DOD could come out tomorrow and say they aren’t subject to any borough and that would be the end of it.
My comment that renting MOA building wouldn’t be covered by the taxes on them isn’t debatable. In what reality do you think the MOA would rent out Chugiak High School for the price of the property taxes? Would you rent out your house for just enough to cover the taxes? Of course not, it would be stupid. As for empty buildings, it’s doubtful they would have more than 1 or 2, the Eaglexit plan on their website shows them using all of the schools. ER/CH property taxes would be unpayable if they had to start building 9 schools on day 1. No, they’ll have to buy/rent them from MOA.
BTW, my taxes will be completely unaffected, as I told you I have moved out of Los Anchorage and I encourage the conservative residents of ER/CH to do the same (I kindly ask the liberals to stay there).
The fact that the board of Eaglexit isn’t addressing these issues is something I encourage you to ask them about.
And Mark continues to lie, and to insult and denigrate in the most disgusting manner.
.
The board of Eaglexit HAS addressed all those matters, repeatedly, at length, and in great detail. The fact that you have refused to peruse any of the information presented on their website, and refused to attend any of their public meetings discussing these matters, is strictly on you and not on them.
.
Again, Mark, either directly address the fact that you are ignorant of the vast amount of work, research, legal advice and background material that the board of Eaglexit has assembled to address EVERY issue you have speciously raised as “impossible” here, or shut up already. Your continued disingenuous lies only discredit you more and more.
Mark, I seriously wonder WHY you are so invested, if as you claim you no longer live in the MOA.
The tax base currently paying taxes to the MOA will shift to pay tax to the new CRB, so income for the new entity is already established. You erroneously seem to be under the impression that the new CRB will not have any income. Primary functions of city government are fire, police, and roads (education being a state function), with a smaller population base and a leaner government, cost containment is easier to achieve. I would much prefer to pay taxes to a smaller more accessible government than the MOA, where you get treated like an errant stepchild. I maintain that partial ownership by CH/ER residents of MOA assets will see the areas MOA buildings transferred to CRB without ANY additional costs.
The DOW does not care where it sends the check for payment in lieu of property taxes. (If your claim had any merit then they would have stopped paying the MOA a long time ago)
You seem to relish the thought of EaglExit failure, which I find disturbing as self-determination is the founding principle of our nation. Nobody is saying that it will not come with difficulties, but that does not mean we should resign ourselves to be ruled by the likes of the assembly forever and ever.
This is awesome!!! I taught at Gruening Middle School for 23 years and then retired and moved to Arizona. THIS MAKES ME WANT TO MOVE BACK HOME TO EAGLE RIVER!!! Congratulations on the movement thus far and may God bless your efforts for the future!
EagleExit is sort of like Libertarianism – sounds good but will never surpass reality.
No, Eaglexit WILL happen, Evan, mark my words!
.
But it is abundantly obvious that radical leftists and pro-establishment shills, like you, bitterly oppose the concept philosophically, because it involves people rejecting increasingly authoritarian centralized control. And if there is one thing that authoritarians (and their sycophants) cannot stand to see, it is people slipping out from under their control.
.
Anyone opposing Eaglexit is on the side of wrong.
Eagleexit needs to happen. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!
That’s all very interesting but irrelevant to me. Your conversation with Mark reveals that one of you is thoughtful and grounded in facts and common sense.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
You write really well Jefferson.
Thank you Evan, I appreciate that.
What a surprise, one shill and lackey for the status-quo establishment supporting another.
Your skiff has turned turtle on a sandbar Jefferson and the tide’s rising. Americans hate Trump. Trump’s approval rating fell to 38%, weighed down by cost of living concerns, Epstein.
Only 26% approve of Trump’s handling of everyday expenses.
Most Americans think government is hiding details on the Epstein files.
Here’s how a Brit sees the Trump corruption:
“Behold. The festering carcass of American rot shoved into an ill-fitting suit: the sleaze of a conman, the cowardice of a draft dodger, the gluttony of a parasite, the racism of a Klansman, the sexism of a back-alley creep, the ignorance of a bar-stool drunk, and the greed of a hedge-fund ghoul – all spray-painted orange and paraded like a prize hog at a county fair. Not a president. Not even a man. Just the diseased distillation of everything this country swears it isn’t but always has been – arrogance dressed up as exceptionalism, stupidity passed off as common sense, cruelty sold as toughness, greed exalted as ambition, and corruption worshipped like gospel. It is America’s shadow made flesh, a rotting pumpkin idol proving that when a nation kneels before money, power, and spite, it doesn’t just lose its soul – it shits out this bloated obscenity and calls it a leader.”
― Oliver Kornetzke
You really should get that TDS checked out, or at the very least get better sources.
Only a true and terminal sufferer of Trump Derangement Syndrome would drag the non-sequiturd of Trump into a discussion about the purely local matter of Eaglexit.
.
How much rent do you charge the president to live inside your skull?
It’s called being civil, perhaps you’ve heard of it.
Although empirical evidence points to a inability to implement it.
It’s called confronting willful ignorance and malicious lies.