Bob Griffin: Too much space, too few students and ASD’s costly imbalance

Mismanaging ASD’s fixed costs robs resources from classrooms

By BOB GRIFFIN

Feb. 5, 2026 – The current active Anchorage School District student enrollment from their Current Student Enrollment dashboard is 41,001 students as of Feb. 3. Of those students, 1,051 are Pre-K students and 4,331 are in homeschool, virtual or charter programs who are not attending neighborhood schools or alternative schools in and ASD facilities.

That brings the current enrollment of K-12 students in ASD neighborhood school building and alternative school buildings to just 35,619 students.  ASD projections indicate that student enrollment will decline by another 2,500 students in the next five years – and previous ASD projections have always underestimated how many students will leave.

February 2026 sets a new record for the fewest K-12 students attending ASD neighborhood schools in at least 47 years. In February 1979, there were 38,398 students in ASD neighborhood schools. I’ve been unable to find enrollment records prior the 1978-79 school year. To find the records back to 1978, I had to refer to the ASD 2010 Capital Improvement Plan. It’s no longer available on the ASD website, but luckily, I’ve saved a personal copy from research I conducted years ago.

After 2010, the district stopped publishing historical enrollment figures. It might have been because it became obvious enrollment was in rapid decline and the administration wanted to avoid highlighting that fact. Now, 15 years later, they’re finally acknowledging the trend to the public.

For those of you following along on with the math earlier, ASD has 2,779 fewer students today than 47 years ago. That’s roughly the equivalent capacity of seven 400-student elementary schools. And very likely to go much lower very soon.

The peak February enrollment for the ASD occurred in February, 2003 with 49,410. Approximately 47,700 were attending in neighborhood schools and alternative school buildings. Anticipating more growth, back the 1990s and 2000s, the district convinced voters to approve many new schools, resulting in the current facility inventory with a capacity for a little over 52,000 students, by state standards.

In the 1978-79 school year, ASD had 5.5 million square feet of school floorspace, and arguably better outcomes. Today, ASD has over 7.8 million square feet of floorspace with almost 3,000 fewer kids. The 2.3 million square feet in additional floorspace added by voters since 1978 is roughly equal to the floorspace of all eight ASD high schools.

School floorspace is expensive to heat, light and staff — and very expensive to maintain. Here’s the guidance from the ASD Capital Improvement Plan:

Best practice within the facility management industry is to re-invest 4% of the Current Replacement Value (CRV) annually into capital projects. These projects can be broken down into three categories: Periodic Renewals (2%), As-Needed Alterations (1%) and Systematic Reduction of Deferred Requirements (1%)”.

Based on the most recent ASD project the replacement cost of design and construction of the 46,210 square foot Inlet View Elementary project, for $50,005,200, it’s fair to conclude that $1,082 per square foot is representative of the 2025 Current Replacement Value of our schools per square foot. That number continues to go up every year.

From that, we can conclude the taxpayer cost of maintaining our school buildings in the future will be 4% of $1,082/sf or $43.28 per square foot per year or $43.3m/year per million square feet of excess floorspace. And increasingly more expensive in follow-on years.

Too be clear: That maintenance cost figure outlined above does not include the cost of heating, lighting and the salaries and benefits non-teaching staff who are unique to each of our schools.

Here’s an actual example from the current ASD budget: Elementary School X is at 49% capacity and adopted a budget with 23 staff positions. Of those positions, 17 were classroom teachers and six employees were non-teachers unique to that school building. These non-teaching positions include the principal, clerical, technical, maintenance, custodial staff, etc.

The pay and benefits of non-classroom teacher positions make up about $400,000 of the $2.2 million staff budget for that school. That adds another $7 per square foot per year for operating that facility. If that school is consolidated with another school with low enrollment, the classroom teachers would be moved to fill vacant classrooms in other schools.

The next cost is the energy and utilities cost. For the School X example, their budgeted cost for energy and utilities runs another $181,000/year, about $3 per square foot per year.

All-in, surplus elementary floorspace runs about $50 per square foot per year to heat, light staff and maintain. That’s $50 million/year for every million square feet of excess floor space, or the equivalent to $100,000/year salaries for 500 employees. For secondary schools  the figures are pretty similar.

Right-sizing our district won’t be easy. People get personally and emotionally invested in their local neighborhood schools. That’s understandable. But mismanaging fixed costs by keeping excess buildings open robs resources from our kids’ education.

What we need to ask ourselves: Is the emotional attachment of keeping a particular school open more important than being able to refocus those resource savings into supporting our kids’ and teacher in the classrooms?

Bob Griffin is on the board of Alaska Policy Forum and served on the Alaska Board of Education and Early Development.

Latest Post

Comments

7 thoughts on “Bob Griffin: Too much space, too few students and ASD’s costly imbalance”
  1. Thx for the horrifying numbers. When will we finally bite the bullet and fix the monstrosity and do the business of educating children? No one has the guts and they keep whining about more $$$ needed. Keep the performing schools open and bus the kids to those or homeschooling will put them all out of a job!

  2. Homeschooling continues to win. The grift that is government schools is in its twilight, but like rats they will fight every step of the way for our money as it all comes to an end.

  3. Well. It looks like ASD educators got their wish. They have lesser students or smaller class sizes when they cursed at parents to just dis-enroll and leave when they don’t like the school. Parents are taking them up on it.

  4. I graduated from East in 1979 with a perfectly serviceable education that put me in a good position for success at college and grad school. My son, for contrast, attended public school except during Covid, when I homeschooled him, did not graduate because the public schools could not find a way to engage him in anything meaningful. He attended AMYA and got his GED.

    I tried mightily to find out what curriculum was so that I could continue his homeschooling without him falling behind his peers when he returned to school, only to be shuffled around various ASD phone numbers and finally told they did not have that information and that every teacher decided what they should teach. That was a blatant lie, but I suppose they felt justified in deflecting since they really weren’t teaching much of anything. In 1979 there was an education to be had if one applied oneself. The same is not true now, at all. We shouldn’t be paying one red cent for the crap ASD passes off as education.

  5. I would add that ASD has known all along that those Covid subsidies were running out, but they did nothing to show any fiscal responsibility and put aside something to make up the difference, or plan in advance how to meet the lesser budget. Now, of course, it is a crisis, but a crisis of their own making. Does the superintendent not own a calculator? Or did he not pass sixth grade math?

  6. The leaders have to Right-Size the school districts to match the smaller enrollments. It’s their responsibility. just like it’s the parents responsibility to see that their child is being educated. It’s not the ASD teachers who will watch a young adult child struggle for life because of not receiving a better k-12 education. It’s going to be the parents watching their “baby” struggle through out their twenties, thirties, and forties IF they live past their 25th birthday.

    Since Alaska Schools aren’t competent at teaching the five core subjects. Parents need to find another education source who will.

  7. Duh!
    We have known for decades that the ASD board is enamored with real estate. They seem to think building palaces somehow educates kids by sheer environment like osmosis. It just angers me to have all those tax dollars wasted on physical structures, that they do not care to maintain, instead of investing in good and basic curriculum and more teachers.
    Consolidate schools, sell or lease out the real estate and I bet your budget problem will disappear.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *