By SUZANNE DOWNING
Sept. 6, 2026 – “Rank the red” is a zombie strategy making another appearance in Alaska Republican circles, promoted as a simple solution to the complications created by ranked-choice voting.
The slogan tells Republican voters to rank every Republican candidate before considering anyone else. On its face, it sounds logical: If one Republican is eliminated, the voter’s ballot transfers to another Republican. This only happens when the also-ran Republicans refuse to withdraw and rank the leading Republican.
It’s complicated. Alaska’s short experience with ranked-choice voting shows that “rank the red” is far from a guarantee of victory, even in a state where more than 54% voted for Donald Trump (no ranking needed.)
Alaskans approved the current election system in 2020 and first used ranked-choice voting in a statewide general election during the 2022 special election for Congress after the death of Congressman Don Young. Under the system, voters may rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives a majority (50+1) of first-choice votes, the last-place candidate is eliminated and the ballots cast for that candidate transfer to the next preferred candidate.
The crucial word is “may.” Voters are not required to rank every candidate. They may vote for one candidate and stop. Most Republicans do that because they want to vote their values, not settle for less.
Across roughly 112 federal, statewide, and legislative contests conducted under Alaska’s system from 2022 through 2024, only three produced a winner who had not been leading after the first-choice count. All three occurred in state House races in November 2022, none in 2024.
In House District 11, Republican Julie Coulombe initially trailed independent Walter Featherly. Republican Ross Bieling was eliminated, and enough of his voters ranked Coulombe next to edge her ahead.
In House District 15, Democrat Denny Wells led the first count with 46.6%, while Republicans Tom McKay and David Eibeck split the Republican vote. After Eibeck was eliminated, McKay received enough transferred votes to win by four votes. The official Alaska election report showed Wells with 3,379 first choices, McKay with 2,812 and Eibeck with 1,026 before the ranked tabulation.
In House District 18, Republican David Nelson led the first round while Democrats Cliff Groh and Lyn Franks divided the Democratic vote. After Franks was eliminated, Groh moved ahead and won with 51.9%.
Only about 2% to 3% of Alaska’s RCV races in 2022 through 2024 resulted in a genuine come-from-behind victory. Looking only at the approximately 22 races that required additional tabulation, the figure rises to roughly 14%. Even within that narrower group, the first-choice leader still won most of the time.
Republican messaging after the 2022 election often implied that Alaska’s biggest electoral problem was conservative voters failing to rank additional Republicans. The evidence does not support that. In 2024, Republicans were told to not rank, and instead pressure was put on the also-ran Republicans to drop out and let the one Republican get on the path to victory.
Nick Begich led the initial count in the 2024 congressional election and remained ahead through the final round. Ranked-choice voting did not reverse the order established by first choices.
National research shows the same general pattern. FairVote, an organization that promotes ranked-choice voting, has estimated that only about 4% of RCV elections produce a winner who trailed after the first round. Its analysis of Alaska’s first congressional special election noted that Peltola began with a nine-point lead and retained it after Begich’s votes were redistributed. FairVote describes come-from-behind victories as rare.
Maine provides the country’s most prominent federal example of a reversal.
In 2018, Republican Rep. Bruce Poliquin led Democrat Jared Golden in Maine’s 2nd Congressional District, 46.3% to 45.6%, after first choices were counted. Two independent candidates were then eliminated. Golden received a much larger portion of their transferred votes and won the final count, 50.6% to 49.4%. Ballotpedia’s tabulation records the first-round and final-round totals.
That race demonstrates what ranking is designed to do: allow a candidate with broader secondary support to defeat a candidate with a narrow plurality.
But Golden’s subsequent victories do not provide additional examples of that reversal. In his 2022 rematch with Poliquin, Golden began with a four-point first-choice lead and expanded it after independent Tiffany Bond was eliminated. In 2024, Golden again led the first count and remained ahead after the tabulation. The Associated Press reported that the 2024 count confirmed his initial lead.
Maine and Alaska therefore tell a similar story: Rankings can change a close election, but most of the time they do not change which candidate finishes first.
That brings Alaska Republicans back to the strategic question. It is different this time because, like with Palin in the race in 2022, there are Republicans for governor who have refused to concede to the leader.
In 2022, the Alaska Republican Party promoted “rank the red” while Sarah Palin jumped in on the congressional race and she and Nick Begich competed against each other and Democrat Mary Peltola. Palin and Begich nominally encouraged their voters to rank the other Republican, but Palin’s campaign continued attacking Begich. Palin also called on Begich to withdraw, even though he had filed first.
The slogan could not repair the political damage. Enough Begich voters either ranked Peltola ahead of Palin or did not rank Palin at all. Peltola, meanwhile, entered the tabulation with the largest and most unified first-choice coalition. Contemporary reporting confirmed that the Alaska Republican Party and both major Republican candidates promoted some version of “rank the red,” even as the candidates continued their rivalry.
By 2024, the approach had changed. The Republican Party’s slogan was no longer “rank the red.” The operative message became “drop if not on top”:
Republicans who finished behind the leading Republican in the primary were encouraged by the party to withdraw and allow the party’s strongest finisher to face Peltola without another major Republican dividing first-choice support.
Republicans consolidated behind Nick Begich. He led the first count and won the election. An analysis of the strategic shift noted that “rank the red” had largely been replaced by an effort to consolidate the general-election field after the primary.
In 2026, Democrats have demonstrated that they learned from the Republican consolidation strategy. After the gubernatorial primary, Tom Begich left the race and backed first-place Democrat Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, reducing the likelihood that Democratic first-choice votes will be divided in November.
Republicans, by contrast, have no clear statewide message or strategy about how voters should approach every race on the November ballot. Some activists are reviving “rank the red,” but not for US Senate or US House — only for governor. The Republican Party leadership seems paralyzed as Nov. 3 hurtles toward us and conservatives are puzzled about which strategy to use in which race. My prediction: This won’t end well for Republicans in November.
Suzanne Downing is founder and editor of The Alaska Story and is a longtime Alaskan.




24 thoughts on “‘Rank the red’ is a slogan, but not a strategy. Alaska’s election history proves it”
A sad 😢 day for Alaska is coming in November….
Then All the Republicans should had dropped out after the Republican getting the most votes this 2026 August primary.
We the voters are left with no choice but to Rank the three Republican gubernatorial candidates. Ranking the Red could work if Republicans ranked the same order but so many Republican voters will likely vote their consciences and mix up the order I doubt the rank the red process. Unity behind 1 is the sure way for Republicans but unfortunately the AKGOP doesn’t want to unite behind Wilson/Shower.
1. Bronson
2. Taylor
3. Wilson
That’s my order of ranking. Wilson has too many skeletons in the closet to trust she’s a true conservative. I can’t stand the thought of Chris Tuck (her baby daddy) hanging around the governors mansion. That’s almost as bad as JKT!
Forget Tuck. Protect the baby from JKT.
Hmmm(?) … “What Then” happens when undesirable candidates slip on the ice (ie: cracking their head) or crash their plane in Lk Clark Pass between now and the election?
Amy Dembosky will be running the administration and most of the republican women’s club will be there, all you have to do is follow the money.
1) Bronson
2) Taylor
3) Wilson
The above comments already make Suzanne’s primary point. A discombobulated Republican ranking scheme will not work for the governor’s race in 2026. The only strategy in this case is unification. The Democrats figured that out for their candidate 10 days ago. Why do Republicans not get it?
.
Mike Dunleavy won his 50% + 1 in 2022. Sarah Palin (I did not rank her and never will) further proved that RCV takes out the non-unified party. Republicans could spend the next 30 days using computers and a myriad of ranking scenarios with the current 4 in the governor’s race, using best estimations for general election turnout based on past turnouts, and the Democrats will win under each scenario. Reason: the spread is too great for Republicans. In a tight party race such as this one, only a unified party candidate can beat the Democrats. But which candidate? The clock is ticking. Bronson, Wilson and Taylor need a very strong dose of reckoning and they need to do this sooner rather than later. For the good of Alaska.
Mayor Dan’s earlier comment hit it on the nail. While Democrats are racing towards the general election with their one candidate, the Republicans are still stuck in the primary election …….all by themselves. Obviously not a winning strategy. This is exactly what RCV was intended to do. Benefit the Democrats.
Republicans better get with it……and fast.
I agree, JKT will most likely be the next governor. Hate to type that out but it’s looking that way. With that said, as long as we have this system and as long as we have infighting on the republican side then I will continue to push the candidate I see most fit. I was all in on Wilson then started looking in to her non political life. Saw red flags and wanted to say something. People can sit here and say leave the personal side alone but to me it goes hand in hand. Maybe I am on the wrong side of history but who knows.
“JKT will most likely be the next governor”. And it WILL be your fault. You just admitted that you are choosing JKT over Wilson. ” I was all in on Wilson then I started looking into her non-political life”. But you somehow didn’t bother to look into the political life of JKT…..How about if you just admit that you are a JKT supporter, and not a conservative of any kind. Maybe just type THAT out. Busted!
While half of the Republicans be ranking the R’s Bronson, Taylor, Wilson. The other half will be doing the reversal.
Well either end up with Treg as Governor or we’ll end u with JkT. I think JKT will be getting the Most combined 1st place votes and he’ll end up winning almost likely for having Democrats unified behind Plus voters who either or do not align politically with a party plus an compromised Republicans who can’t afford cutting the budget nor government.
Pride and Ego. The two human characteristics that produce failure more than any others. Lack of recognition of the two aforementioned characteristics position pre-failure every time. It takes real concentration of the facts, an astute mind, and extreme discipline to overcome these conditions. The best minds will prevail under the current circumstances.
Dr.,
You forgot the most essential: survival.
Mother Nature is supposed to instinctively supply it in huge doses. Republicans either forget, or they allow the two conditions you mentioned to prevail at all costs.
Appreciate your insight, Dr. Dan; respectfully disagree …only in part.
.
Pride and ego fuel what allows our species to survive and succeed.
.
Does a consistently reinforced pride and ego deficit not lead inevitably to a form of collective learned helplessness fueling the hysterical antisocial behavior emblematic of the radical Left?
.
Maybe the problem’s at the other end …narcissism, a surfeit of pride and ego.
.
Could Republican straphangers remaining on ballot have done voters a favor by revealing: (a) a level of narcissism making them unfit for any office, and (b) their willingness to sabotage the GOP’s mission to advance their own self-interest?
.
Ever wonder why there seems to be as much discussion about RCV process as about candidates?
.
Ever notice everyone seems to know how the process should work but, crucially, no one knows how the process did work?
,
Bottom line: Nothing in the collection of rhetoric, gamesmanship, iprocess, and the impressive array of bad choices persuades us that we lose simply by voting for only one candidate and hoping other best minds prevail by doing likewise
Valid points all above. So who’s going to step-up? Treg is the substantially low- vote getter of the three. Bernadette has some judgment issues regarding family, but is the high-vote getter and the better personality of the three, and Bronson is qualified but hard to get along with and very belligerent and set in his ways. Suzanne makes the best argument for unification, if it can be accomplished through compromise and reason.
Bronson is a blockhead. He will not drop out. He’s too dumb.
Pride, ego, and lack of brains, then.
Taylor is clearly the best choice of the three, rank him first.
Bronson did a great job of running Anchorage despite the antics of the Assembly.
Rank him second.
Wilson needs to step back and let the boys take of this, she should step aside.
Taylor and Bronson need to consolidate their ticket
I bet if the election were held today, Bronson would come in second but JKT would get less than 50%, then the runoff, Bronson wins, becomes governor.
Simple……Treg Taylor as Governor and Mike Shower as Lt Governor. Taylor a lawyer and Shower knows how the legislature works. The rest should drop out. Otherwise disaster. Bronson and Wilson have too many negatives. They need to stick to talk radio. Gasline needs a Governor not afraid to address publicly issues needed to be addressed and a Lt Governor that knows how Juneau operates.
After Labor Day and I can not tell you any issue that any R candidate is running on. Shouldn’t they have hammered home one or two things they are running on by now? Message discipline? Communications?
Also, where are the attacks on the D’s? Terrible campaigning across the board.
It would be a disgrace and humiliating to Alaska to have a limp wristed marxist homosexual for guv.
Sadly, the left-wing’s RCV ruse will probably pay off again. It’s not the general election that matters, it’s the “primary” election. Notice how the democrats treated their results as if it were a true primary and their also-rans dropped out, leaving just one candidate. The Republicans on the other hand have once again been completely taken in by the ruse, and their also-rans have refused to drop out. The deliberately obtuse ranking system usually works to confuse or anger enough voters to screw up the general election.
If the Republicans could ever get their act together, the second, third, fourth, fifth, etc. runners would acknowledge the winner of the primary and drop out. Then RCV wouldn’t really matter.
Rank the red for Governor. We get three votes! Keep the executive branch red!
Vote yes in Prop 2!
[…] ‘Rank the red’ is a slogan, but not a strategy. Alaska’s election history proves it […]