Dear Editor:
As a long-time resident of Juneau who has called Alaska home for decades, I am writing to strongly endorse the re-election of Sen. Dan S. Sullivan. Having watched our state wrestle with economic challenges and resource development debates, I have come to value Senator Sullivan’s consistent, outcome-focused approach. Time and time again, he’s put Alaska first, producing real wins that strengthen Southeast communities and the state’s overall economy.
In an era of political gridlock, Senator Sullivan’s record stands out for his effectiveness. His work has made a real difference in Southeast Alaska. He’s been a committed champion for homeporting a U.S. Coast Guard icebreaker in Juneau, which brings jobs and badly needed infrastructure to Southeast. He’s also pushed federal officials to provide a long-term solution to the Mendenhall Valley glacial outburst flooding, helping the community overcome the federal bureaucracy to secure funding and engineering help to protect local homes and families.
Senator Dan S. Sullivan is the right choice to keep Alaska moving forward. His support for responsible energy development, military investments that strengthen Alaska’s strategic position, and commitment to Alaska families are key to the state’s future. Senator Sullivan’s leadership ensures Alaska’s voice is heard in Washington. I urge my fellow Alaskans to join me in supporting his re-election this year.
Sincerely,
Peggy Ann McConnochie
9 thoughts on “Peggy Ann McConnochie: Letter to the editor”
Not voting for a neocon ever again after what they have done over the past year plus ruining our coalition. There is little difference between a lying neocon and a lying marxist.
I – and I suspect many others – wish we had an actual choice. I will look at the third party options.
Well said, Peggy Ann McConnochie.
.
Agree 100%.
Murky makes Sullivan a super hero.
Like him or not Alaska would be up $hit creek with Scary Mary sitting in his senate seat.
SULLIVAN=TRUMP
TRUMP =POISON
NOVEMBER =PELTOLA
Finish this one:
A woman =
woman. I assume you think that because I’m liberal, I’m going to get all gender generous. My opinion: A male transitioning to a female doesn’t become a female. He remains a male but the term should have an explanatory suffix like, if I were trans, I’d said I’m biologically male but intellectually and emotionally female. Something like that.
No Evan. “Something like that” would say I’m biologically male suffering from mental illness and delusions that I am a woman. Forget the inconvenient truth that me wearing woman-face is nothing remotely connected to being a woman.
whatever
Best be careful when you come across those women sporting women’s panties.
You might get a lot more than you bargained for.:)